Did opening the window put anyone in danger, at least potentially? No
Was the bar inside a fixed structure, or a vehicle? Fixed structure
Was the bar several floors above the ground? No
Did the man move the table closer to or farther away from the window? Not relevant
Did the man’s last action involve climbing up onto the table? No
Did someone else climb up onto the table? No
Does this involve sports? Yes
Was the table a table you eat or drink at? Yes
Was the table a sports table? No
Was the table a ping-pong table? No
Was the man playing a sport? Yes
Was the man spectating a sport? No
Is there any wordplay in this puzzle? No
Was the window in the wall? Ceiling? Wall
Does the man let a ball fly out of the window? Yes
Does he let a dart fly out of the window? No
Does he let a bird fly out of the window? No
Does he let some other animal fly or be thrown out of the window? No
Does he let some other inanimate object fly or be thrown out of the window? No (i.e. it was a ball)
Was anyone injured by what went out the window? No
Was the man participating in the sport? Yes
Were the bar patrons participating in the sport? No
Were the bar patrons merely spectators of the sport? Yes
Is gambling involved? No
So he played a bad shot into the club bar, walked in found his ball, moved a chair and a table out of the way, opened the desired window, chipped out the window back on to the fairway. And I guess he got in trouble because (something something rules of golf about moving obstructions).
**Isamu **got it- the bar at the 18th was in bounds (for some reason). The table and chairs were movable obstructions and so could be moved out of the way, but the window was not (being part of an immovable obstruction), hence a 2 stroke penalty. A pity, as the shot through the window landed 12 feet from the hole and he made par. More info here.
A few years ago, several people met to discuss the following question: Is the Silver Surfer a human being? The people having the discussion were all being well paid for their time. What was going on?
Are they fiction writers?
Were they discussing whether the character of S. S. should in any way be constrained by human physiology?
Is copyright law involved?