Heh heh.
- No
- No
- Not sure how to answer this. I guess yes.
Yes. 62 would NOT work.
No. Standard words.
No.
No.
No not total. She has other friends left.
No to Trump
Did the 51 unfriends have the fruit she gave up as a like?
-
Does this have anything to do with a conspiracy theory?
-
Is the woman ill?
-
Is the fruit unusual?
-
Has the woman converted to a religion?
-
Does it have anything to do with religion?
-
Even if the woman isn’t ill, was the fruit given up on the advice of her doctor?
-
Is the fruit something very strictly speaking, a fruit, or is it a culinary fruit that might technically be something else biologically?
-
Does “swears off” mean “stop eating”?
-
Did she sell the jewelry to cover a debt?
-
Did she give the money gained from selling the jewelry to charity?
-
Is it significant that she used eBay to sell the jewelry, as opposed to a pawn shop, or a brick & mortar auction house?
-
Did she swear off grapes because she stopped drinking?
- Is 51 connected to the weeks of the year?
- Is 51 connected to 3 x 17?
- Is 51 connected to 1 more than 100 divided by 2?
- Do the friends all have the same job?
- Do the friends all live in the same area?
- Does she know the friends through the same activity?
- Does she know the friends from the same period of her life?
Is the woman of sound mind (i.e. not mentally ill, having a psychotic episode or something similar)?
-
Were the pets fish?
-
Were the pets animals she should not have had in the first place-- that is, was she keeping deer or squirrels, for example, as pets, and has released them?
-
Or did she actually release dependent cats and dogs into the wild, which is usually referred to as “dumping,” and is considered an immoral act?
-
In sum, was the release of the animals generally something people would consider a cruel act?
-
Was the release of the animals something most people would not consider cruel?
No.
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- Yes. It’s a regular fruit
- Yes
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- I don’t think it is necessarily so
- Yes
- Yes
Yes. Sound mind.
- No
- No.
- No. Probably still not the nicest thing to do.
- I guess…
- Again I think most people would be rightly critical…
My unanswered questions on post #689 plus the following:
-
Are the unfriended people dead?
-
If yes, is their death possibly connected to the fruit?
-
Is the woman worried she may die too?
-
Did she give the money from her jewelry sale to her children or to other relatives or close friends?
Is the woman expecting to go to prison soon?
Is the woman expecting to die soon?
Is the woman expecting to change place of residence soon?
No to all these.
I think I covered the #689 questions in #691.
No to these.
-
Are all of the pets vertebrates?
-
Are some of the pets mammals?
-
Are some of the pets birds?
-
Are some of the pets reptiles?
-
Are some of the pets amphibians?
-
Was she angry at the people she unfriended?
-
Was selling the jewelry some kind of protest? (eg, getting rid of diamonds, but not limited to that)
-
Did the woman live in the US when this occurred?
-
Is the fruit typically consumed in its raw form, like an apple?
-
Is the fruit (defining it loosely) typically consumed as an ingredient, like coconut?
-
Is the fruit typically consumed as a juice, like cranberries?
-
Did selling he jewelry bring in a substantial amount of money?
I think we need to narrow down the fruit and the pets. I’ll try the fruit.
- Does the fruit have “berry” in its name?*
- Is it citrus?
- Is it most commonly grown in tropical countries?
- Does it have a stone?
- Is the peel or outer coating commonly removed before eating?
- Does it grow on trees?
- Does it grown on vines?
That’s enough for now.
Is the fruit related to a particular American state?
Are the pets related to a particular American state?
Does the woman have the name of an American state? (Including pre-Civil War.)
Does the logic of her actions only make sense to her?
I ask because this sounds like a typical FB meltdown.