Hooboy.
A couple of things.
Anyone ever watch a blacksmith make a horseshoe? Notice that they heat the steel to red hot, but the steel isn’t melted? It isn’t melted, but it’s softened. You can bend red-hot steel much more easily than you can bend cold steel. If steel is red hot, it’s not molten. If steel is molten, it isn’t red hot. Molten steel is white-hot. If you see red-hot bits being thrown out, those are bits that have cooled enough to be red-hot, and therefore aren’t molten any more.
Next, take a look at the collapse videos. They look like a controlled demolition. Or do they? Every video of the WTC collapses show the top floors falling first, into the lower floors. Except that’s not how controlled demolitions look. In a controlled demolition they blow the lower floors first, and the building starts collapsing from the bottom. It looks almost intact as it falls. That isn’t what happened in the WTC collapses, they collapsed starting at the point where the planes collided.
Next, the WTC towers didn’t collapse in a free fall, because you can see debris and particles falling faster than the towers. The debris falls faster because the debris is in a free fall, while the towers are slower because each floor has to be crushed by the weight of the falling material above it.
Next, the WTC collapsed mostly into their own footprints. Just like a controlled demoltion! Except, what demolishes a building in a controlled demolition isn’t the explosives, it’s gravity. Gravity is what destroys the building, the explosives just weaken it. And what direction does gravity pull? Straight down. The buildings can’t tip over like a toy skyscraper.
People have the wrong idea about the strength of materials. The strength of a material is proportial to its cross-sectional area. The weight of a material is proportial to its volume. This means that if you take a 10 foot steel beam and make an exact duplicate that’s 100 feet long, the 100 foot beam has 100 times (10 times the width and 10 times the depth) the strength, but 1000 times the weight (10 times the width, 10 times the depth, 10 times the length). This means that proportionally the 100 foot beam has 1/10th the strength of the 10 foot beam.
And this is why scale models are misleading. You can make a model of a suspension bridge with toothpicks and elmer’s glue. But if you tried to make a real bridge out of telephone poles and glue, it would collapse. That’s because the strength of the glue doesn’t increase.
So every skyscraper in the entire world is being pulled straight down by gravity. Every skyscraper is much weaker proportionally than a small building, because every time you increase the size of the support members you increase the weight of the support members, which means the support members have to be supported. What happens when you remove some support members and weaken others (like, say, by heating them the same way a blacksmith heats a horseshoe)? The things above the weakened spot fall.
And that’s what happened in the WTC collapses.
And further on, the alternative theories about the attacks just don’t make any sense.
Suppose you’re an unidentified conspirator who wants to carry out the 9-11 attacks. Since you’re an Illuminatus, all you have to do is pick up the phone, and minions at the highest levels of government, religion, media, and business will leap to do your bidding.
And so…what makes sense? You want to destroy the towers, you want it photogenic, you want to use the resulting media images to movtivate the sheep-like American people in certain ways. What would make sense?
You could wire the buildings with explosives. You could order airplanes hijacked and crashed into the buildings. Either would work. But…not both at the same time! And if you order the hijacking of the planes, why would you inform your other minions at the FAA or the military? There’s no need. All you need to carry out the plot are 19 religious fanatics. You don’t need to call the military and tell them not to intercept your hijacked planes. Why would you? Why would you need to order the investigators to ignore evidence?
The simplest easiest most foolproof plot is the official story. Hire some doofuses to hijack planes and crash them into the WTC, the Pentagon, and the White House. There’s no need to cover up anything if the official story is the actual story. The only mystery is the identity of the mysterious Illuminatus who ordered the attack on America. Osama bin Ladin was the guy who got together the money and assembled the teams that carried out the hijackings. I suppose there could be an Illuminatus even higher up who pulls Osama’s strings.
But the problem with any conspiracy theory is that the consensus theory makes too much sense. Any hypothetical conspirators would have to be idiots to have carried out the plot in other ways. Law of Conservation of Illumination. If you want Kennedy killed, simplest way to do that is convince Oswald to head up to the book depository with a rifle. There’s no need for anything else. No need for a cover-up of the official story is the real story.
