Yes, it was done for a Japanese company.
So, my bad.
[ul][li]6 + 11 = 17[/li][li]9 + 11 = 20[/li][li]These are two equations[/li][li]9 + 11 - 2 = 18[/li][li]18 ia the sum of six and twelve[/li][li]6/12 is the date on which O.J. Simpson (allegedly) killed Ron and Nicole[/li][li]O.J. Simpson claims that the police have to find the ‘real killers’.[/ul][/li]Thus the connection is obvious. Al Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11, and Conspriacy Theorists are only pointing out who the ‘real killers’ are.
Oh…
20 (the sum of hte second equation) minus 17 (the sum of the first equation) is 3. So there were only three aircraft involved. The Pentagon was obviously hit with a missile.
Truely you have a dizzying intellect, sir. 
-XT
Wait 'til I get started!
Proud to say that test was performed at my work under agreement with Sandia on our SNORT (Supersonic Naval Ordnance Test Track). Here’re the links for my work and for SNORT.
Yes, and the sum 18 has two digits in it. And September has 30 days. Subtract 18 from 30 and have 12, (or 4 x 3), indicating 4 incidents but only 3 planes. Then if you add those numbers together you get 7. Subtract one (for the one day it all happened on) and you get 6. And If you repet 6 three times (for the number of real planes) you get 666. :eek:
If you have Bittorrent, here’s a critique and rebuttal of the video:
Oh, please. You don’t think that that’s maybe just a little farfetched? :rolleyes: :dubious:
I wish I worked on or for something called SNORT.
But it’s math. How can you argue with math?! 
Oh wait, I see notice that you did use “4” different emoticons, indicating the four planes. Gotcha. Never mind, then.
Oops. 
There.
Ok, when I came back in to check the thread the Google ads were all for pilot training. That’s just mean.
Whoo-hoo-hoo that producer Dylan Avery! look who knows so much! It just so happens that that movie here is not only MOSTLY misleading but disliked even by conspiracy theorists. There’s a difference between loose change 1 and loose change 2. loose change 1 was caught with lies. Loose change 2 dropped some items but the rest remains innuendo and misunderstandings, so instead of telling the truth for producers of this kind there is only one thing they can do.
What’s that?
Make some slight changes and look for loose change III…
(Apologies to Miracle Max)
BTW those 9-11 research people still find some “gold nuggets” on loose change 2 but the fool’s gold is still there and even the so called “gold” they mention looks suspicious, IIRC at the Zacarias Moussaoui trial, the final moments of flight 93 are accounted for.
http://911research.wtc7.net/materials/supplements/loosechange.html
Actually, one of the bomb sniffing dogs the CT’s claim was removed died at the WTC.
This ‘study’ consisted of a guy going up to 8,000 feet over London, Ontario and playing a few times with his cell phone. Then extrapolating the numbers up to 32,000 feet. Not honest, not thorough.
One can connect with a cell phone from a plane, the problem is jumping from cell tower to cell tower can cause lost connections. Oddly, Loose Change complains that many of the calls are ‘just a sentence or two’. To them it means that secret government voice emulation is being used, rather than indicating that the phone calls are having trouble staying connected.
Other calls were made using the in-flight phone.
A suprise.
Then again, after the first attack, I suppose they would.
The hole is the size of the fuselage and and the engines. There is in the available photographs clear damage (admittedly lighter than that caused by the fuselage and engines) precisely the width of the wings. You can see photos that show exactly this even on websites run by conspiracy theory nutcases with captions saying the opposite, which tells you that my description of them as nutcases is accurate.
There is footage of the planes flying into the WTC, but the conspiracy theorists think that no explanation for what happened to the WTC. Presumably therefore, even if there was footage of the plane flying into the Pentagon, conspiracy theorists would not think that was an explanation for what happened to the Pentagon. Yet when there is no clear footage of the plane flying into the Pentagon, that shows that a plane didn’t fly into the Pentagon.
Go figure.
While the the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey no longer owned the complex, they still used it for their headquarters and it was a Port Authority Police dog that died.
So, it’s presence there was co-incidental in the first place?
Then, the removal may have been due to building management not wanting dogs peeing all over the place?