Crunch, I don’t mean to be persnickety, but you chose a poor example.
I own to books on the making of “Jaws”. It was shot in sequence, ROUGHLY. That is to say, the first day of shooting was the morning after the shark attack. They had the shots where the deputy is puking, a few birds circling overhead. ( Yes, they did indeed throw down some bread to draw them in.) They did the early stuff, the town stuff.
They did the attack stuff, as best as they could. The shark was late arriving from Universal, and then didn’t perform on time OR well.
Still, Carl Gottleib the screenwriter does break it down into the basic sections of the story. They did the attacks early on, the town meeting stuff, etc. Then…when they really were out of material, they moved to sea. This is how the story progresses anyway.
There were many days when they sat on the barge out at sea…waiting for the shark to work. And, to not go insane, they’d set up little shots…of the ocean. The sky. The ocean and the sky. A bird OVER the ocean in the sky. Apparently, a lot of this stuff wound up in the movie. Can never have enough B-Roll…
Some films are shot SERIOUSLY out of sequence. The recent film “Spy Kids” shot out all of Antonio Banderas’ shots in two weeks, because he had a previous film job. I mean, EVERY shot they needed of him, they got, even if it meant recreating scenes later with body doubles, or shooting around his angles.
The movie I shot in 1995 called “No Way Home”, with Tim Roth had some of this. Deborah Karr Unger had to be shot out in time to get to Toronto to do " The Game". So, we did what we had to do to get her out in time…
Cartooniverse