SteveG1:
But they do work. They get an issue out in the open, they send the message that people have run out of patience, they get media attention, and they “inform” politicians that they will not be coming back next election if they refuse to listen.
If Ted Nugent can talk smack about shooting people and Cliven Bundy can seize and occupy a federal facility (and get away with it), then by God, people can peacefully walk around with signs and tell their politicians why they won’t get re-elected.
This discussion is serious. Quite literally deadly serious.
I like to pretend I never heard of Ted Nugent sometimes.
Why do most seem to happen to east coast??? And northeast for that matter too.
Too bad. He’s one of you. Just *like *you, actually, except for the fame, the riches, and the talent.
Luciano700:
Pity post.
You are soooo fucking funny.
With apologies to Miller . . . Fuck you, you little still wet behind the ears can barely grow a beard know-it-all, fffffuuuuuccccckkkkk yyyyyuuuuuooooo!
I heartily look forward to the day that you either grow the fuck up or get banned.
CMC fnord!
Even if that was true, what’s your point?
Those kids don’t matter?
Of course, I seem to remember some shootings in Texas, Virginia, Kentucky, Colorado, and even Washington State.
Procrustus:
Even if that was true, what’s your point?
Those kids don’t matter?
Of course, I seem to remember some shootings in Texas, Virginia, Kentucky, Colorado, and even Washington State.
I never said they don’t matter.
Compare to population map.
Mass shootings happen where the people are.
SteveG1
February 19, 2018, 6:43pm
91
ElvisL1ves:
Too bad. He’s one of you. Just *like *you, actually, except for the fame, the riches, and the talent.
Talent?
He’s a hack.
Seriously.
Then please explain what point you were trying to make about the geographic distribution of school shootings. I honestly can’t figure out why you thought it was relevant to anything?
SteveG1:
Talent?
He’s a hack.
Talented enough to get rich and famous with it.
Well first off my bad, other map I saw was very blurred.
SteveG1
February 19, 2018, 6:47pm
95
Luciano700:
Here’s more insight from me so that you all could take me more serious
The following are just “off the cuff” ideas. I have no idea if they are practical.
I think people who want to own anything above a basic handgun should be required to have X-amount of hours training with common weapons. I think just as a person needs to demonstrate a fundamental ability to drive a car without plowing into a group of people in an outdoor strip mall, if you want to own weapons, you should have to learn how to shoot straight, clean a gun, dismantle it, operate is safely, turn a safety on and off, load and unload, and then have to take practical exams at a firing range. (GOOD)
I think practical exams should include being able to hit targets with a certain percentage, being able to clean and disassemble, then re-assemble a gun in a limited time period. (GOOD)
Except a handgun? No. Include them too. Also, include a federal background check - a REAL check, to bar felons, nut cases, and people who have connections to hate or terror groups.
SteveG1:
Except a handgun? No. Include them too. Also, include a federal background check - a REAL check, to bar felons, nut cases, and people who have connections to hate or terror groups.
I am glad we can finally agree and be civil
And then the check is all good to be in
jsc1953
February 19, 2018, 7:40pm
98
For all those who say it’s “too soon” to “politicize” a tragic event:
Pretend we’re having this same discussion today except it’s about Sandy Hook. Is 5 years enough time?
Thank you. Carry on.
Riemann
February 19, 2018, 7:42pm
99
Now you’re exploiting six-year-olds for political gain. Is there no limit to your depravity?
Does this honestly make anything approaching any type of sense in your head?
