I put this here because it involves a TV show and a toy
I was watching a rerun of One Day At A Time and the boss had this toy in his office.
It had 5 metal balls and each one was suspended from a wire. And what he did was first he pulled the first metal ball back and let go. This ball then hit the other balls but only the fifth ball on the other side moved. The metal balls inbetween didn’t move at all. Then of course, the 5th metal ball returned and hit the 4th ball, which didn’t move but the original or first ball moved again. And it continued.
I’m not really describing this well but it looked kind of like this
I can’t really draw it because this bulletin board removes spaces. But does anyone have an idea of what I mean and if so, what kind of toy this was. The show was from the late 70s so it was probably a thing from around that time
Newton’s Cradle . My dad had one with a wood frame. I used to enjoy the heck out of it when I was five. Now that I have a desk of my own I can’t imagine why I’d want one.
What’s really weird is if you start with two moving balls, then two balls fly off the other end, instead of one moving real fast. So it “keeps track” of the number of moving balls. How does it know???
My grandmother used to have one of those and we loved it. You can do all kids of cool things–if you take two balls and drop them one at a time you’ll get a nice rhythm going.
Well, I came in to mention Newton’s Cradle and can see I was beaten to the punch, so for your enjoyment, allow me to present the world’s largest Newton’s Cradle. I only wish there was some video.
Newton, was Isaac and he wrote at least three laws of motion. Folklore says he developed them after sitting near an apple tree and seeing an apple fall to earth (not onto his head, as some folks have exaggerated). The thrid one is that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Ergo, when any number of his cradle’s balls hits the others, the force is transmitted through the others and the equal number of them reacts by being bounced forward. The third law is much further explained here: