nm. dp.
I’m fine with the thread. This is the Pit, not one of the more functional forums. I don’t see much difference in the OP and many threads in the omnibus forums. They just post a description or quote. It’s obvious why they’re upset–they don’t have to spell it out. And a link is just a quote, ultimately.
I think this one qualifies. It’s obvious why someone would object to Trump hijacking an Episcopalian church, without permission of the actual owners, for a photo op to appeal to his base–who aren’t even Episcopalian.
It would be nice if this would wake his “Christian” followers up, but we all know it won’t.
I doubt that many of the short-fingered vulgarian’s “Christian” supporters identify with the Episcopal church.
Is it just me or do conservative women who become popular with the media all seem like a variation of a theme? Peroxide blonde, tanned skin approaching leather (or the other side and pale), painfully skinny and too much makeup with overly long eyelashes.
McEnany, Conway, Coulter, Ingraham, Crowley, Murrell, Loudon, Lahren…
I know there are conservative women who do not fit that mold but c’mon…
Barr looks like he’s auditioning for a community theater production of Shrek, and McEnany looks like Pilot Barbie Career Doll without the hat.
Barr looks like he stopped at a funeral home on the way there and stole a dead guy’s suit.
I have honestly never seen him look more like Droopy Dog than in this pic. I had no idea what I would see when I clicked the link and the first person I noticed was Barr and the very first thing that popped into my head was “Droopy Dog.”
[Moderating]
Try harder next time.
[/Moderating]