Here’s the challenge (and hopefully fodder for debate):
Name one policy that you believe is a great idea but is unconstitutional, and one policy that you believe is a terrible idea that is constitutional. For the purposes of this thread, “constitutional” means you believe it is allowed under the U.S. Constitution, regardless of what courts have actually decided.
Good and unconstitutional: Donor disclosure requirements for campaign spending Bad and constitutional: Federal prohibition on the personal use of marijuana
I think most people understand that “unconstitutional” is not a synonym for “bad.” Slavery was once perfectly constitutional. When communities on both the left/right discuss a topic and someone points out a proposal is unconstitutional it’s usually brushed aside as a minor impediment, assumed that at some future time there will be enough popular support for amendments.
Good and unconstitutional: Laws regulating gun ownership (not sure exactly what they are, but I’m thinking along the lines of what other countries do that don’t have the equivalent of our 2nd amendment).
Bad and constitutional: In God We Trust on our currency.
Also, I’ll see your marijuana and raise you cocaine.
These are impressive. I reckon very few people would list those policies in those slots. I award you 100 intellectual honesty points.
This is also a pretty unusual one. I think very few people believe affirmative action is allowed under the Equal Protection Clause, but that it’s bad. I award you 50 points.
Wait, what? You think Casey/Roe are (at least partially) correctly decided? Or am I misreading?
I’m afraid I cannot accept those points. I forgot the part about the OP where we had to believe it was in the constitution regardless of the how the SCOTUS ruled. I was going by current jurisprudence, not my own reading of the causation. I think some others may have made the same mistake.
25 intellectual honesty points for admitting your mistaken interpretation!
I’ll add some more…
**
Good and un-constitutional**: Required Miranda warnings Bad and constitutional: Excluding refugees from countries impacted by certain levels of terrorism