The point, in case you missed it, is that on every issue where Obama and Romney disagreed, Romney was wrong and Obama was right.
No he’s simply pointing out that most humans agree on most things. When someone says party x is wrong on everything, the clearly imply that they are wrong on everything where they differ from the other party.
Who’s tablecloth?
This! 
I thought this went without saying, but apparently not.
Thank you for proving our point; activist extremist Republicans play an absurd game of false equivalence. You just provided a sterling (if rather odious) example.
But I don’t want an Oxycontin addiction!
Shut up and take your medicine.
The guy quoted in the OP is a massively enormous dick. Anyone who would defriend people on Facebook because they voted for Romney is a smaller dick. But turning this entire conversation into a compare and contrast between those two types of behavior is distracting from the important issue of how of a massively enormous dick the guy quoted in the OP is.
RickJay is a Canadian, so I doubt that he’s an activist extremist Republican.
It comes as quite a surprise to me that I’m a Republican. Hell, I’m disqualified three times over.
Well, there’s human trafficking; solves the same problem.
Why not? Sam Stone is.
??? Romney is not Hitler and Obama is not Churchill. Hitler is Hitler and Churchill is Churchill and I chose them because they are well-known contemporaries who were on very opposite sides, more so than Obama and Romney, and yet one can point out many things they agreed on.
Can we now define RickJay’s Law that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Limbaugh approaches 1?
But I’m not. Look, Romney would have been a bad President, but he’s not a Nazi. Jesus, it’s like Fox News got cloned, but in a weird mirror universe, and all their mirror-pundits are coming here.
And the search for equivalence continues…
I’m confused, who said Romney was a Nazi?
He was the quantum candidate. He both would and would not have been a Nazi.