A loophole that will give gays equal protection from discrimination

After reading some of this thread:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=73248

and this article, linked to from within said thread:

http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/local/21001_bully01.shtml

I got to thinking how up in arms the right-wing fundamentalists would be if, while I had been in school, I (now an atheist) had started actively, vehemently, and loudly denouncing fundamentalists as abominations whose sick lifestyle choice should be condemned and fought by all good citizens. In public school, it’s likely I would have been severely disciplined.

Then a solution came to me. A way for gays to receive legal protection from discrimination:

Declare that homosexuality is a religion.

Gays can claim religious freedom for their beliefs, and protection against discrimination for their sexual activities, which can be classified as religious worship/ritual. (heck, sex is a religious experience for most people, right…?)

A somewhat funny proposition, but honestly, it could work. Whaddaya think? Any …um… converts?

This sounds about as plausible as someone delaring a heroin addiction to be a religion (after all drugs can be a religious experience for some).

Our Smack, which art in this spike, hallowed be thy street names. Thy nodding come, thy jones be done . . .

Even if it’s a religious practice, it’s still not allowed to do illegal things (like Voodoo practicers have to obey health codes when they kill their goats, Mormons can’t practice polygamy (when they did so)), so gay marriage and sodomy would still be off-limits. I reckon it would not be considered discrimination if you fired someone for openly admitting they do illegal things, so gays still would probably be SOL. What would probably work best is start a religion but make it all secretive so no one knows what its beliefs are, get it all accepted and respected, and then reveal that homosexuality is a required practice. It’ll go over much better. But it seems really like just a roundabout way of achieving acceptance the way gays are already working to do; you have American’s love affair with religion (whoops, sorry, little editorializing slipped in there) to help you out, but there’s also a strong undercurrent of rejection of small, “weird” religions that will pull you down, so I figure its kind of a wash.

But, hey, at least you’d get some money from Bush’s “faith-based chartities” plan!

Religions are distinguished by beliefs, not actions. Could rapists escape prosecution by declaring rape to be a religion? Of course not.

And of course referring to homosexuality as a religion would imply that it is a choice.

I would think that a better loophole would be exploiting the “stereotypes” section of the law on sex. It could be argued that all the discrimination on gays comes from stereotypes of how people should be.

“Boys, it’s Hail Mary, not oh, Mary!”

Esprix

If homosexuality was a religion, only half of the parishoners would be on their knees.

As a heterosexual, am I still allowed to say :smiley: ?

Nice attempt, Toad, but this is an issue that shouldn’t need a “loophole”. 'Sides… if homosexuality were a religion, where would the holy book be?

While I don’t agree with the suggestion of the OP, not all religions have a standard holy book. Take Wicca for instance. Wicca does not have a single standard holy book, yet it is still a religion.

Well, one reason not to just “Declare that homosexuality is a religion” is the small fact that it does not happen to be one. A thought…

Spoofe: Tales Of The City. :smiley:
One basic problem with this idea is that I simply couldn’t become a member of the Church of Harvey Milk of Latterday Fags because I’m already a Wiccan. So there you go.

Jeez, and here I thought that’s what Unitarian Universalism was for… :wink:

Esprix

“Lord, bless this meal we are about to recieve…”

Dianetics isn’t a religion either. But with a few minor alterations it becomes Scientology, which is offically recognized as a religion.

…and please forgive me if I’m bringing this up in an inappropriate place, but

HUH?

I knew andros had been around for a good long while, but I thought he was a bit more prolific that that.

See here for an explaination.

Fenris

Roger. Thanks for the link.