[There may be a factual answer to this question, though I place it here in IMHO since I’m soliciting expert opinions. Mods, please feel free to move if it would be more appropriate elsewhere.]
Background: I recently ran a marathon in 3:49:43, i.e., at an 8:46 min/mile pace. I did this by starting at a more conservative pace, and then increasing my speed in the second half since I felt I could, with the result that my first half was run at a 9:05 min/mile pace (total time 1:59:00) and the second half at an 8:27 min/mile pace (total time 1:50:43).*
My question: I’ve heard that the most efficient way to run a marathon is at an even pace throughout. Assuming this is true, is there any way to figure out approximately how much better my time could have been if I had run at an even pace? For example, should I have tried for an even 8:30 pace? Or would that have been too ambitious/not ambitious enough?
*Some finer-grained data, for anyone who cares, in case it makes a difference:
5K: 8:55 min/mile
10K: 9:21 min/mile
15K: 9:02 min/mile
20K: 9:08 min/mile
HALF: 8:37 min/mile
25K: 9:10 min/mile
30K: 8:37 min/mile
35K: 8:08 min/mile
40K: 8:16 min/mile
Finish: 7:58 min/mile