Now, this may sound silly, but I DO mean it seriously…
So there I was at the YMCA, taking a cycling class. I haven’t been on a bike in forever and normally do aerobox and step. These stationary bikes (couldn’t tell you the brand) had the exact same types of seats I remembered from regular bikes. Riding on them was sheer pain and torture!~!!! 45 minutes of this was like the Bataan Death March for the Behind!!! Now, understand, I’m in great shape and I’m actually hoping to get my ACE cert to teach group fitness next spring-- so this wasn’t a case of “well, she never gets OFF her butt, so naturally it was sore after a little exercise.” My question is, WHY would anyone design a bike seat this way? Is there actually a reason? I fled to Target and got a gel seat for later use, but why in the world is a bike seat NOT just designed so that it isn’t amazingly painful to use in the first place? Does it cause the bike to be more aerodynamic? Easier to handle? What??
Stationary bikes are designed to be used in a gym. I think they are uncomfortable because they are designed for maximum durability and ease of cleaning, which are the most important criteria for the buyer (= gym owner).
In my experience, after the first couple of rides of the season the pain mostly goes away. I’m not sure why, it may be the skin getting desensitized, or it may just be a matter of finding the right posture/position. Or it could be that as your arms and legs get conditioned, you start supporting more of your weight on them, which means less weight on your butt. Even if you’ve been doing other excercises, the specific muscles that support your weight on a bike may not be developed.
Not that I’m an expert on this, since I only ride recumbent bikes these days. Absolutely no pain in the butt.