[QUOTE=Ale]
…you seem to have a narrow view of history
[/QUOTE]
I rest my case.
Oops, hit reply too soon
Alright, I’ve had my breakfast and spent the time looking for a cite.
You premise is “… (white is) a category that only exists due to a political effort to fracture decent.” Something invented by Europeans in what became the US with a political purpose.
In that case I can simply point out to any instance of Europeans being defined as white by non Europeans, with no explicit racial segregation agenda, to falsify the premise.
I happen to know, for instance, that the term for a white person in Malay is orang putih, which literally means white man (you may be more familiar with orang-utang: orange man), and that term has been used by the Malays since they first came in contact with Europeans:
[
](http://alwestmeditates.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-arrival-of-portuguese-malay-annals.html)
As you see, their first reaction was to define them as being white, which carried on over time.
As for your second request for a cite, I didn’t claim what you said I claimed, so there’s no point.
No sequitur and a strawman.
Please quit with the claim that I am suggesting that this will solve implicit bias.
I am not going to bite.
:dubious:
Where did I say what?
It is not of any use, he wants to preach his strange view, and replies only with the assertions of falacies (incorrect ones which is a bit amusing itself).
Please describe, in two hundred words or fewer, an example of what the same event/interaction looks like both before and after the “goal” is achieved.
TIA 