About remote viewing…
I would just like to say with regards to remote viewing, that I too was skeptical. I have been VERY skeptical about things like UFO’s, Out of Body travel, and all those other holloween sounding “contrivances” foster on us by our society. Still, I gave remote viewing a chance ( it’s day in court if you will ) and, as a resuilt have had to take a closer look. I took the HRVG online class.
I followed the program as I was asked and came up with some very astounding results that really defies conventional thinking. When you do a target blind, meaning you are only given an address which is the target ID number ( or letters ), and not given ANY other information, and you actually draw a picture of the target that is validated when the target address is “unlocked” for your inspection on a prearranged day, the result is nothing less than shock!
On one session I had generated data regarding “water”, “flooding”, a picture of a helicopter. When the target ID became available for my inspection I was quite astounded to find that indeed the picture was of a helicopter over water, the flooded Holeman Airfield in Minnesota from about two years ago.
The same thing happened with another session where I drew a picture of what looked like an upside down bolw turned slightly sideways with lines drawn in front of it, and words that had come to mind like, “people, music, clapping”. The picture I drew indeed looked like the Hollywood Bowl.
The target WAS the Hollywood Bowl. SO something was deffinitely going on that I could not explain with conventional thinking, but at the same time that does not mean the acceptance of magical thinking either.
However, not every RV session one does ends with that kind of success. Many sessions are only marginally good, meaning that while some of the data is congruent with the actual target, much of it is not, or is TOTALLY off.
How to explaine that? I don’t know, but I do know that that is no reason to dismiss RV out of hand.
I would suggest that we keep our skepticism. It’s a good thing if practiced properly. By that I mean a decided difference between blatent closed mindedness and real skeptical thinking where one “remains open to the truth REGARDless of what the possible truth might be.” Even if it violate our most cherished beliefs. That takes a real maturity rarely found on public discussion boards.
So what IS the truth about Remote Viewing? I don’t know. But I imagine if we take all that energy we have expended by saying something is bullshit, dismissing it out of hand, and applying that energy in real honest research, our own personal explorations or that done in a scientific lab, we might be able to find out.
Robert