Reported.
No dog in this fight, but that statement is utterfuckinghilarious.
Well, I’m glad you didn’t let lack of knowledge keep you from sharing your opinion.
Anyhoo, there’s a pit-thread that goes over the high-points if your interested.
So where is this insult anyway?
Here you go, because I know it’ll be totally productive and persuasive:
For how many posts do you think it’ll be productive to bicker over whether these are insults? I have a number in mind, and if you’re psychic, you already know it :).
I’m not enabling him, however. Came to my conclusions all by my lonesome.
I agree with Princhester. There aren’t any insults there.
Fair enough. Like I said, I think they’re borderline, and it doesn’t remotely upset me that the mods disagree, or that Princhester disagrees; it doesn’t even upset me that Peter agrees. My point never was about Princhester, and still isn’t.
Well according to Colibri you aren’t reporting posts so of course they went unanswered. Also since you claim that anyone who doesn’t agree with you as lying and personally insulting you it’s a little hard to take you seriously after the millionth time you lay the claim.
He spoke of one specific forum in a limited time period.
Throw me a bone here, were his posts free & clear of the rules against thread-shitting, hijacking, or “don’t be a jerk”? If you avow that he did not violate those rules & that your shorts aren’t in a twist simply because you don’t agree with him, then yes, I will delve into the mystery that is Peter Morris.
I’ve taken it to the point where you have been forced to “put up”, and that is enough. I have confidence that others will form an appropriate view, once the facts are provided.
That’s not true, and really rather insulting in itself.
I haven’t called any Doper a liar in years. Last time I did it, I got a Warning.
Yes. Yes they were. They were entirely free of any of these things. Despite this, the mods went to great lengths to waste their time and energy on devising and defending a controversial anti-PM ruling, because they are corrupt and like to mod to defend their sacred cows.
Well, actually, I don’t know about any of the above. It’s just my default assumption in the absence of me having a clue about what I’m talking about.
3years is “limited”?
I find it highly insulting that you find my post insulting. You Sir should feel bad for making me feel bad.
OK, so leaving aside the “lying” part, do you agree that you claim that anyone who doesn’t agree with you is personally insulting you? I’m guessing not.
Anyone else have a view? Because I know what mine is…
1 year.
For 2 of 3 years the Randi ban prevented me from posting.
The question that was asked in the OP has been resolved. Since this has now become a personal squabble, you can take it to the Pit. I’m closing this.