Actor/Actress is LESS good looking than the real thing

Its usually this way that a real life individual is played by some heartthrob or sex kitten, much more attractive than the original. I know its subjective,

Cases where this is reversed.

Some of the actors in Tom Hanks space projects, the real astronauts seem better looking and in better shape than the actors (Lovell, Frank Borman, David Scott especially).
I thought the cast of the Social Network was on average less good looking than their real life couterparts.

Grace Kelly > Nicole Kidman.

Not “better looking,” necessarily, but I can think of two examples where the real-life character had an objectively hotter body than the actress who later played her: that pinup girl who got murdered/Mariel Hemingway (who played her in Star 80); and, Marilyn Monroe/Michelle Williams.

Such questions will always be a matter of personal taste, but the real Erin Brockovich could give Julia Roberts a run for her money.

Back when the movie “Factory Girl” came out, I remember thinking that even though I think Sienna Miller is very attractive, Edie Sedgwick was just stunning in her prime.

In the book Pride and Prejudice, oldest sister Jane was remarked as being the most beautiful of the Bennet sisters, one of the most beautiful girls in the county. Susannah Harker, who played her in the BBC miniseries didn’t meet that, IMHO.In this picture, she’s the one wearing the cross in the back.

StG

Naomi Watts played CIA agent Valerie Plame in Fair Game. I don’t know if Valerie Plame is more attractive, but she is really, really good looking. Too close to call.

Muhammad Ali better looking than Will Smith

Dorothy Stratten. She was a thousand times hotter than Mariel Hemingway, who has never done much for me (though I did once have a Russian girlfriend who looked remarkably like her):

http://iv1.lisimg.com/image/2478576/600full-dorothy-stratten.jpg

So, the boob job didn’t help Mariel? Sad…

British generals

Allenby, as good looking or better than Jack Hawkins

Charles Gordon, as good looking or better than Charleton Heston.

The Duke of Wellington, as good looking or better than Christopher Plummer.

In 1981, there was a TERRIBLE made-for-TV movie called Miracle on Ice, all about the 1980 Men’s Olympic hockey team.

Coach Herb Brooks was 42 years old and halfway decent looking when his team won the gold medal. But Brooks was played by… Karl Malden!!! Malden was 69 years old and, er, considerably less handsome than Brooks.

The real Erin Brockovich looks like she could be Meg Ryan’s sister. In fact, I’ve often wondered if they considered Ryan to play the role before Roberts.

*Anyone *portraying Marilyn. There’s no way to recapture the qualities of the original. I don’t know why people think all you need is some makeup and a wig, and maybe some padding in the obvious places.

I have nothing against Gretchen Mol, but she does not beat Bettie Page.

Fanny Brice wasn’t exactly gorgeous, but when she wasn’t making funny faces, she was closer to it than Barbra Streisand.

Kate Blanchett is no slouch, but she’s no young Katharine Hepburn either.

Jennifer Love Hewitt and Emmy Rossum are certainly both good looking women but they’re not at Audrey Hepburn’s level.

Seems like lots of these are Hollywood biopics where someone is portraying a famously hot movie star. That’s kind of cheating. It should be something like the poor bastard playing Richard Nixon is much less hot than the real Richard Nixon.

Marcia Gay Harden, Deborah Kara Unger and Kate Beckinsdale have all played Ava Gardner. MGH, to her credit, didn’t rely on the makeup department, but used her talents as a better actor but lesser beauty to portray a lesser actress but greater beauty.