Pigs in glass houses shouldn’t throw mud.
True, but let he who is without sin be worth two in the bush.
Damn it, manson, next time spoiler-box that shit. Some of us haven’t finished the season one DVDs yet.
They’re Republicans. Torture-supporting, science-ignoring, freedom-hating theocratic bigoted Republicans who will believe whatever nonsense they’re told to believe so long as the one telling them what to believe slobbers all over a flag while doing it and call that patriotism.
I don’t think Republicans are lowlifes because they support Trump, I think they support Trump because they’re lowlifes. He’s just their type.
I’m just puzzled why these people are all so obsessed with how great Russia is.
:smack::dubious:
Sorry. Season 2:
Hillary Clinton killed Nicole Brown and framed OJ. IT’S IN THE REPORT!
There are two types of people in this world who mix metaphors. Nobody likes either one of them.
Me too. In the same way I feel sorry for all the poor, deluded, trapped creatures occupying our prisons. She’s always known what Trump was, and she voted for that with every fiber of her being. To hell with her. She should burn alongside her husband.
Does inviting a known anti-Semite to speak at a White House Hanukkah reception “Make American Great Again”?
Do you know any?
Haters are gonna see me rolling.
Next time I see one of these cracks, I’m going to open up a can of do you even lift bro.
These puns are really going over the dead horse on this motherfucking plane.
It’s all fun and games until too many cooks gather no moss.
Why do you assume people have it in for you personally, rather than your presenting shit arguments ?
Make like a tree and spoil the bunch.
You can lead EasyPhil to water, but that’s as good as a wink to a blind horse.
Bear in mind I really can’t be arsed to read any of that shit (400 pages ? In another country, that I can’t spin into a paper on medieval this or that ? Fuck that right now), but I still say those statements don’t contradict themselves.
One says “the Steele Dossier was used to secure a warrant”, the other says “the Steele Dossier wasn’t really brought forward in the investigation”. Both of which can be true at the same time if e.g. the only use of the Steele dossier was to secure the warrant, after which point the investigation focused on information secured from the warrants.
That might cast some shade on the propriety of the warrant if it turns out the Steele Dossier was BS, but if the warrant itself unearthed some prime dirt then that’s really neither here nor there. Only the beleaguered defense lawyer raises up on the propriety of the search warrant that found the 20kg of grade A marching powder stashed under the defendant’s bed. Because that’s all s/he’s got at that point.
In the land of the blind, only the one-eyed die young and leave a good looking to pasture. And you can take that to the bank, mister.