“In re-reading, I suppose you could be simply explaining the procedure that you used,”
Truly I was.
“or heaping scorn on the idea that all Internet mispellings need to be corrected…”
No heaping of scorn. That was not my intention. I suppose my sarcasm could be misinterpreted, for sure.
“but certainly on first read, your post seemed to suggest you were defending your typo as an accurate spelling, based on your Google research.”
I did incorrectly assume that my Google research was correct. I’ve never had the issue arise before. I assumed I was getting the correct info - - really, I didn’t know I had to go and look up all possible spellings of a word in the dictionary and then search on google before posting. lol! But I wasn’t justifying or defending my misspelling of the word - - I just didn’t know it was misspelled. I can plead ignorance right? lol! Oy.
“Keep going Yogini, I’m learning alot about the Yogic mind from you.”
Please, Daniel, don’t assume that I speak for the universal “Yogic mind”. You’re giving me way to much credit - lol!
“The rough, paraphrased translation of Namaste is The Divinity of Me Recognizes the Divinity in You. There can be no other ‘intention’ behind it.”
Google search: Namaste - In Sanskrit “Namas” means, “bow, obeisance, reverential salutation.” It comes from the root Nam, which carries meanings of bending, bowing, humbly submitting and becoming silent. “Te” means “to you.” Thus “namaste” means “I bow to you.” the act of greeting is called “Namaskaram,” “Namaskara” and “Namaskar” in the varied languages of the subcontinent.
There’s my intention behind it.
“Asking someone if they’re being sanctimonious means “I think you’re being sanctimonious, but I just don’t want to come out and say it””
I again think this is assuming intent and I don’t think it’s appropriate for you to do so. If you want clarification for something I say, I’d be glad to help you out. I was asking someone else’s intent because I didn’t want to assume that I was correct in my perception of her intent. Understand?
“Jarbaby Say: Person Who Use Excessive Smilies Has Limited Gift of Expression”
Would you prefer I put in little physical things I’m doing as I type this, such as “I’m rolling my eyes as I say this” or “I’m grinning from ear to ear because you’re amusing”. ??? I LOVE the emoticons!! I use them frequently everywhere on the net.
Dammit. That’s what I get for rushing my responses. Oh well, again, admitting I am human and fallible…lol! Sorry for attributing your name to someone else Daniel - lol! Fun, fun!
I think I want this thread to die now!! (I can wish death on a thread right?)
In case you’re too dense to realize (and you’re very much coming off that way in this thread) your incessant use of “lol!” is making a great deal of us want to stab ourselves in the eye with the nearest sharp object.
This isn’t a teen chat room. In case your keen sense of observation hasn’t picked up on it, most people around here don’t use “lol”. It makes you sound like a giggly 12 year old.
Too keep doing it when posters here have not so subtly hinted that it’s highly annoying is just antagonistic.
Claiming to be all about peace, love and rainbows while blatently being antagonistic towards those you’re claiming to be making peace with is for lack of a more eloquent term, really fucked the hell up.
“your incessant use of “lol!” is making a great deal of us want to stab ourselves in the eye with the nearest sharp object”
Good Lord. It appears "a great deal of you " are wound too tightly. I think I said before I use “lol” or emoticons to make the point that I’m not becoming overly aggitated or ruffled by other folks and that I don’t want them to take everything I say so seriously. If it is bothering "a great deal of you " then I will take that into consideration if and when I post in the Pit. Thank you for pointing that out Lez, I wouldn’t want to be the cause of you inflicting pain on yourself.
“Too keep doing it when posters here have not so subtly hinted that it’s highly annoying is just antagonistic.”
I didn’t pick up the subtle hints. That’s why I kept pointing out “assuming” - - it’s hard to note someone’s intent online. I personally ask for clarification a lot because I’ve been misread and I’ve misread others. I try to avoid that as best I can. It’s easier if someone, without freaking out, would just say…“hey, the lol’s are annoying, could you cut it out?”. It’s all in the way you approach someone, ya’ know? So as not to cause someone to get defensive.
“Claiming to be all about peace, love and rainbows while blatently being antagonistic towards those you’re claiming to be making peace with is for lack of a more eloquent term, really fucked the hell up.”
I don’t believe I ever did claim to be about “peace, love and rainbows” nor did I blatently antagonise. That would be fucked the hell up. (No smilie or “lol” inserted to avoid further antogonizing you or others).
Hey, imagine that. I said something insulting about you, but phrased it as a question, and you were still insulted! Now, here’s the difficult part: how is what I said to you about being an idiot, similar to what you said to jarbabyj about being sanctimonious? Think really, really hard now. Figured it out yet? No? Well, here’s the surprising answer:
It’s exactly the same fucking thing, you brainless twat!
Boy, the things you can learn on the internet, huh?
Miller, THAT was an insult? I was supposed to be insulted by THAT? L-O-Fucking-L! Too rich. As if your asking if I am an idiot could be insulting. I think it says more about you than me for obvious reasons. I don’t know you, you don’t know me…I don’t care what you think about me…therefore, I could not POSSIBLY be insulted by anything you choose to say…including your pathetic, immature choice to call me a “twat”. You are truly a sad, sad individual.
You can mind your own business. If jar had wanted to bring this up with me, I’d have gladly addressed it with her - - as it was OUR discussion. Kindly butt the fuck out.
“how is what I said to you about being an idiot, similar to what you said to jarbabyj about being sanctimonious?”
We both asked a question of a poster. I chose to answer yours…unfortunately. My lesson learned after this post - - is never to respond to you. It’s not worth the effort - - you’re just not the kind of person I want to communicate with on any level. I would NEVER call someone names. I may say they are acting like an idiot, but I would not CALL them an idiot. I certainly wouldn’t call someone a twat.
Talk about fighting ignorance - can someone please work on Miller. :rolleyes:
