The Telegraph’s use of the word “warmists” in its headline makes the paper’s credibility in this field suspect all by itself. IME, that word is never used save as a snarl-word by AGW-deniers.
“Warmists”? Silliest pejorative evah!
Let’s take a page from PETA and start calling them Global Warming Kittens.
Oh, you’d like that, wouldn’t you?! I see through your ploy, you want us planet saviors to adopt something warm, fuzzy, and vaguely gay! Ha! Forget it, pal, the warming wombats aren’t stuped!
I’d prefer “Warmies.”
Concise, sufficiently patronizing, and reminiscent of a brand of diaper.
Why are we bothering? This story is clearly buased bullshit. Look at the very first paragraph:
We all know the chief job of scientific committees is to kill us all, not simply scare us.
Let’s see them warm their way outta this one!
You realize, don’t you, that when we get to Hell, its always Pledge Week?
Yow!
Call them hotties and you might get a lot more attendance at the meetings.
Well, of course. That’s why they’re trying to preserve the population of BEARS! :eek:
Well, I think so, BrainG, but are you sure that’s what they mean by the “bear necessities”? Narf!