Yeh… I screwed the pooch when I typed ‘errot’. I did indeed make a mistake. It’s like the air traffic controller who told the plane to turn ‘left’ instead of ‘right’,
Wait… no it’s not. It’s more like the ATC who forgot his wife’s birthday and then later didn’t crash the planes.
Look, it’s not just Magiver. There have been more mistakes, and factual errors in this one thread then I’ve ever seen in any other thread here. And they still just keep coming. Some are typos, some are lazy bullshit mistruths cut from whole cloth.
And none of it matters to anyone except that pesky idiot (me).
Oh well. I’m a bit picky about facts. Sorry. just habit, I guess.
I’ve actually had a controller tell me to turn left instead of right toward my destination heading. He wanted me to circle 270 degrees to give some space to other traffic but left out that bit of information. So I asked for a repeat of instructions and was given the reason. The Controller wasn’t particularly busy and basically wasted time on the first instruction.
Challenging someone is how you stop mistakes from happening. As has been pointed out in this thread before most aviation accidents involve a series of mistakes that add up to an accident. 583 people died when 2 747’s collided because 1 person didn’t question authority. I think the same holds true in this case.
I wouldn’t call you an idiot but pesky isn’t too far off here. You also managed to spell my name wrong in your response to me. But it’s not your multiple typos. it’s the snark.
Gun safety is pretty straight forward regardless of location or circumstance. It’s mostly just common sense.
Back in the day, I had a Garmin tell me to go straight. The street was under construction and the asphalt was all torn up. I was driving a Jeep Wrangler, so I put it in 4 wheel drive and drove around the barricades.
“I’ve never heard the term ‘cold gun.” I’ve never heard that term, literally. They’re just talking about stuff I’ve never heard of. It’s just infuriating,” Clooney said.
Which was followed by:
“That is something that is always used, ‘hot gun,’ ‘cold gun,'” said motion picture armorer Bill Davis. “That’s the way we do it, that’s been done for years. If he hasn’t heard it, then he’s been living under a rock for the past 30 years.”
The actor added that he personally makes sure to take any six-shooter he’s handed on a set like the one Baldwin was handling and point it at the ground before firing the trigger six times to ensure it is in fact safe to handle.
I’m not trying to knock Clooney, but that sounds a bit odd too. Aren’t most films shot on sets? Pointing a gun at the ground and pulling the trigger six times doesn’t seem like the greatest idea, either.
If, as he says, he examines it first to see it’s empty then he’s demonstrating a gun he has certified as empty to the crew who are likely spread out on the set and can benefit from the demonstration.
This is considerably different than handing a gun you haven’t checked thoroughly to someone who doesn’t check at all and who then tests it on a person.
Wow, fuck that lady for her transparent cash grab. This part in particular:
Mamie Mitchell’s IMDB credits go back to 1980. She’s every bit as much as “industry veteran” as Baldwin. How come she doesn’t have any responsibility here for not speaking up when the AD handed an actor a gun and told him it was cold?
“I am depressed. I don’t feel safe. I feel that at any moment anything could happen to me and to those that I care about that are standing close to me,” she said. “I do not have a sense of guardrails in my life to keep me safe. I’m frightened of the future."
Join the fucking club, lady. It’s the 21st century. Everyone feels like that.
I checked different sites, since the NY Post is basically a scandal rag. I don’t think the plaintiff has a legit complaint, but she sure excoriates Baldwin. That’s understandable because after all, Baldwin…has a lot of money.
The lawsuit alleges “assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and deliberate infliction of harm” and seeks unspecified punitive and compensatory damages
[site]
She also claims Hutchins was “a new but good friend.” In other words, “I just met her two weeks ago, but in retrospect and because it helps my suit, we were besties.”
It [the lawsuit] said Ms. Mitchell, who was standing less than four feet from Mr. Baldwin when the revolver discharged, “sustained serious physical trauma and shock and injury to her nervous system and person” and “will in the future be prevented from attending to her usual occupation as a script supervisor.”
What kind of physical trauma did she incur?
Allred’s a feminist, but she does seem to crave the limelight. I’m not sure why she took this case. Maybe nobody else connected to the Rust production wanted her, and she saw this as another chance to get her name in the news? Or maybe she figured Baldwin would settle, and she could get a million or two out of the deal?