The OP is correct that it’s wrong to equate black and African-American, and I’ve seen such errors in the press. (For example, I remember an article at the time of the Nicole Brown Simpson/Ron Goldman murders about the “African-American” hairs found at the crime scene.)
A South African who moves to the US is a South African-American. Doesn’t matter if they’re white or black.
Yeah, it’s a little more awkward than Italian-American or Irish-American or Nigerian-American or Chinese-American or whatever, but it at least sticks to the standard of (generally) referring to country of origin rather than continent.
African American, on the other hand, refers to the North American descendents of African slaves. They tend to share a common cultural identity. You may have noticed them.
Unlike the other terms, it does not refer to country of origin. It’s what some people like to call an “exception.”
Seriously, why so supposedly clever people have a such a hard time with this?
So what box does the black guy from Belize who became an american citizen check on his college application?
For fuck sake, African American leaders have been refering to the African American community for a long time. Are you suggesting that they are only refering to a limited group descended from slaves, or do you think they are refering to all black Americans?
I don’t know. What does someone with a Filipino mother and a half-Kenyan, half-Spaniard father check on his college application? He writes something in or picks something that pleases him and goes with it. That forms which ask for race sometimes give unnecessarily limited options is not terribly convincing to me either way on the proper appropriateness and scope of various terms.
I think their base of support is, by and large, the group descended from slaves, and they are primarily talking to those, though, of course, they intend their civil rights messages to apply to all humans. The slave-descended group form a cultural community which those who only recently immigrated from Africa are no more a part of than the average white American is a member of the culture of Europe. It can be useful, therefore, to distinguish between the two. As for whether the term “African-American” is actually used in that manner, well, that’s an empirical question.
'Course all black people aren’t African-American! There’s African-Americans, and there’s niggers! Right? Am I right? Who’s with me?
Man. There really is no way to make that bit work when you’re white, is there?
Actually, no person I know whose ancestors were sub-Saharan Africans uses any term other than black. The majority of polls I have seen (which shift frequently, based somewhat on demographics and somewhat on how the question is posed) have tended to give a slight preference among the members of that community to “black,” as well. Therefore, I tend to use the word black as shorter, less confusing, less likely to irritate one of the anti-PC offenderatti, and much less likely to irritate my associates.
The graph was in response for a request that ALL sodas are called “coke.” 12.38% is a far cry from all, even if the graph *only *represented the South.
If I have learned anything here at the SDMB, it is that words mean whatever people want them to mean. Feel free to think that only albinos are white, or that native and Native mean the same thing. I have not standing to argue. However, any dark-skinned person (or sometimes not so dark-skinned) who identifies as African-American is counted as one, regardless of whether he is descended from African slaves. At least far as the government is concerned.
As far as I am concerned, African-American is a meaningless term. I’ve been told in this very forum that if you are raised by African-Americans, you get to call yourself one, and anyone who questions it is a bigot. To exclude white South Africans seems downright inhospitable to me.
Got any examples of white South Africans immigrating to the U.S. and fleeing home in tears because they were prohibited from identfying themselves as “African Americans”?
Inhospitable? It is just an attempt to use words in ways that people will recognize what is being said. Noting that “African American” is a flawed coinage is not helped by being silly, trying to wedge in separate meanings that everyone knows in advance break the rules and do not convey the clearly accepted meaning.
It’s all bullshit. I’ve never heard an announcer for the Olympics refer to “that African-Englishman” or “that African-Frenchman,” (It’s just an Englishman or a Frenchman), yet we hear “African-American” all the time. A label that denotes the country of origin can be helpful in some situations, but what the fuck does the color of a man’s skin have to do with anything? Never mind, don’t answer, that’s a hijack.
No. Would it be pertinent if I did? Has anyone up to now said anything about immigrants fleeing in tears? Does a South African even have to give a shit in order for for the term “African-American” to have a specific meaning? Was there anything in the OP, for example, that addressed such issues?
Everyone knows? Really? As I said, if I have learned anything here at the Dope it is that words mean what anyone wants them to.
Except, I guess, when* everyone knows* what they mean.
So, hmm… what is wrong with “black”? As a matter of fact I almost never identify myself as “black” but as mulatto. Neither word is pejorative where I come from and they describe perfectly well what I am trying to convey.
You were lamenting that the denial of a word to a particular group was inhospitable. I just wondered if you had actually seen anyone suffer for such inhospitality.
You are the one assigning a different meaning to a phrase that has been current in American English for close to twenty years and insisting on your right to assign it in a different usage.
The role of Hunpty Dumpty, in tonight’s performance, will be played by Contrapuntal.
12.38% represented the entire country. Therefore, the percentage of the South it represented may well have been much closer to 100%, especially if we limited our focus to, say, the area around Atlanta.