It reads like nonsense in the original as well. Here’s a simple question for you:
Newton’s model of gravity predicts the speed required for a satellite (natural or man made) to orbit at a specific distance from a body. Einstein’s theories refine this to explain some observed discrepancies. How does your theory explain the exact behaviour of orbiting bodies?
So can we condense your theory into “Displaced Space is where it’s at”? It’s a lot quicker to read than the OP.
MANTRAPHILTER, you have a great future writing ad copy for alternative medicine. Or is that your day job already?
OK - isn’t it about time we stop indulging a clearly…different…individual?
Better than my head.
you’ll have to define what you mean by exact behavior of orbiting bodies because if you mean mathematical equations, they can only give a close estimate due to the relativity factor.
so you must know what that feels like also in order to be able to compare the two sensations.
When you said that gravity ends where the vacuum of space begins, am I right in thinking you are using a different definition of ‘vacuum’ from the one that we commonly use on my planet?
You avoided answering my question. I’ll rephrase.
Has your hypothesis been peer reviewed and results corroborated by a recognized scientific journal or body?
Did you even read what naita wrote? I’ve highlighted the bit that your response fails to take into account.
So matter creates areas of denser luminous aether? Now it all makes sense.
He has diagrams that explain that.
my definition of the vacuum of space that exists around our planets displaced space is the less space from the photographic negative effect of the suns displaced space. how strong that vacuum is, is relative to the displaced space you are exiting.
wat?
p.s. Nature abhors vacuuming.
Are there any other well-established terms you would like to redefine for us?
Do you know who else had diagrams that explained things?
the energy from the sun enters the displaced space of a planet/moon whatever. charges the surface that faces the sun while the negative uncharged side is attracted to the positive charge of the sun. This creates rotation. The planet does not move into the less space that exists farther out from its own displaced space. and is pushed away by the positive charged surface but the negative side is still attracted. Rotation through magnetism.
Hard to be true to our charter here if we quit fighting just because ignorance is fighting back…:mad:
Well, there are the rules of apostrophe use and capitalization…
Vacuums are not loud because there is no sound in a vacuum, so all the sounds in the room try to hide in your ear from the vacuum at the same time, making it seem as if the vacuum itself is loud.
I have diagrams if needed.
A (somewhat) related post from Randal Monroe.
(ETA: add “inertia” and “angular momentum” to the list of things the OP doesn’t understand.)
