If you’re trying to say something, you’re going to have to be clearer.
I guess I probably would.
I also believe the USA would have been more involved in Asia, leaving the Germans to turn Europe into their own private vital space. The USA and Japan would combine their efforts to subdue China, India, and eventually Russia. Siberia could become the new El Dorado for the USA, while the Arabs and the German Nazis in tandem would proceed to ethnic cleansing in the sub-Saharan Africa in a similar manner to what the European colonists did to the Natives in North America but on a more massive scale. The USA would control puppet states in North, Central, and South America. It would also control vast territories in China, India, and former Russia. The Russian empire would be dismantled and divided between Germany, Japan and the USA. Increasing frictions would arise between the USA and Japan over the territorial control in Asia. between the Arabs and USA over territorial control in India, between Germany and the Arabs over territorial control in Africa. Australia would turn into an American stronghold. The Arabs would fail to form a cohesive force and their power would dwindle while Iran would rise as a new Nazi ally of the Germans that would control Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkey for them, and aiming to establish its influence in the entire North Africa. To ensure its control in Asia, the USA would form a strong alliance with Iran as well. The USA would ensure its economic success in all the occupied territories by offering the enslaved populations the opportunity to become paid workforce in all the infrastructure projects and businesses initiated across the new global American Empire.
Are you’re forgetting Bermuda and Newfoundland on the British side? And St Pierre & Miquelon on the French
Given this is prior to the post-WW2 independence movement, you may have forgotten a few: Commonwealth Caribbean - Wikipedia
Several people have mentioned Hitler and the Nazis. Let’s keep in mind this was World War I not World War II. There were no Nazis back then.
If you have a point, why not share it with the class? What do you think would happen given the OP? Did you watch the video linked? If not, that’s fine, but would be nice if you have a point if you would make it. Just this ones. Perhaps in something more substantial than a one line drive by?
Couple of things here. First off, you are talking about way into the post war time frame…post WWI just as a reminder. It’s pretty unlikely that the Nazi party woulda arise as it did in our timeline, unless you posit that even with the US joining their side that Germany would go down exactly the same way, with exactly the same events that lead to Hitler. Even if you want to assert that, this thread isn’t talking about any of that.
There’s no way. In order to do a good blockade, you have to outnumber the suprssed force by a good amount, so they dont sally and also so your ships can go back often to coal. The RN was nervous* about “only” outnumbering the High Seas Fleet 28-16. Add in the USNs 10, and it’s pretty much impossible to blockade both the Germans and the Americans.
- and given Jutland, justifably so.
*Coal *fired ships.
All would have fallen to a hostile United States.
Yep, and quickly, had the Marines wanted to.
One of the big contributions America could have made to the Central Powers war effort would have been allowing German submarines to base themselves out of American ports. This would have greatly expanded the submarine war in the Atlantic. Unlike in WWII, Germany did not have naval bases along the French coastline; all submarines had to be based out of Germany or Belgium and traverse the North Sea and sail around Scotland or through the Channel to reach the Atlantic.