Amateur analysis of Celtic Woman's blandness

I’ll let you in on something I realized a while ago: from the inside, ALL “ethnic” or “folk” culture is lame. :smiley: It only appears exciting to outsiders.

What periodically happens is that people who are descended from some ethnicity or other rediscover it, and then, being unfamiliar, find it “cool”.

Like the resurgance of Klezmer music among young, hip Jews - my grannie thought it was utterly bizzare, that the kids were freaking out to what amounts to Jewish polka, considered in her day the height of lame-ness – the sort of thing her parents would have listened to at a wedding, while the kewl kids rolled their eyes.

Where are you seeing this? From my point of view, it seems like mainstream entertainment targeted at kids is overwhelmingly white. High School Musical, Hannah Montana, Zack and Cody…all white kids. Okay, it’s not any good, and yeah, there are famous non-white kids, but I’m not seeing how white=bland.

Part of Celtic Woman’s appeal, IMO, is the ethereal nature of the singers’ voices. The music is supposed to be angelic, pretty, and aesthetic as opposed to drenched in the pain, pleasure, or heartache of the singer. I don’t think the singers are completely devoid of passion, but I can understand why others would find the singing very vanilla. I don’t think the emphasis on technical singing somehow denigrates the music or makes it inferior to music where “passion” is preferred to technical perfection.

That resurgence was coupled by heightened interest here and elsewhere from Christians and post-Christians alike. :slight_smile:

Yup. They of course are even more ‘outsiders’, and thus all the more likely to not realize it was “lame”.

Picture some kids in central Asia, grooving to Lawrence Welk.

My idea is that, generally, all folk culture is lame to the actual “folk” it was created to serve; it becomes cool by virtue of being exotic.