It’s not new or surprising that some people dislike scabs. It’s that the word itself is supposed to be an insult. That’s new to me. Some people really hate the Catholic church and therefore hate priests. But the word priest itself isn’t pejorative.
So when the OP says “Remember that if you cross a picket line you’re a fucking scab,” it sounds to me like “Remember that if you graduate seminary and take Holy Orders you’re a fucking priest.” I’m like “yeah, that’s…kinda the definition of the word.”
Slavery is immoral and illegal. That’s something one is compelled to oppose. A labor dispute isn’t immoral or illegal. I’m not compelled to support one side or the other, any more than I’m compelled to support your or your parents when you’re in some family tiff with them.
How am I supposed to support the workers’ quest for higher pay when I don’t even know what they make in the first place?
[quote=“Broomstick, post:48, topic:852954”]
Really? I remember my parents wouldn’t cross pick lines to patronize businesses with strikers back in the early 1970’s
I didn’t say they couldn’t care or wouldn’t care. I said this is the first time I’m hearing they ought to care. Like they should be compelled to pick a side.
Why am I to believe they’re being treated inhumanely in the first place? When teachers strike in a state halfway across the country, how am I expected to know the first thing about their workplace situation? When athletes strike/lockout while negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement, am I supposed to argue for how many games they play a season or what roolie contracts should have as a minimum?
[quote=“Joey_P, post:54, topic:852954”]
Scab has never been a positive thing. Ignoring any feelings about any particular picket line, if you take a job at a place with workers on strike, you take away their bargaining ability.
Right, but if we’re “ignoring any feelings about any particular picket line,” then we’re also, by force, ignoring any feelings about if you take away their bargaining ability. For scab to be negative, you have to assume we do in fact care about the particular picket line.
Right. So? Sucks for those workers. Great for the scabs. There’s a winner, there’s a loser. What’s your point? I’m not being rhetorical here; I feel like your post is one sentence too short.
You’re missing the point of the analogy. The point is there is no opposing team because there is no my-team. The home team isn’t even from my state. Either team could be the opposing team. Or both could. I have no idea what the rules of the sport are.