America is not reacting well to terrorism

For me, personally, September 11, 2001, changed my outlook on life in this way: I have found a cause that I am willing to die for.

No, I haven’t signed up for the military. My knees are in poor shape, limiting my ability to run and jump. My 1-year-old baby needs a father around as long as possible. And, our government is not seeking draftees.

There’s another way I feel that I can give my life over to this war effort. I refuse to live my life any differently than I did before Sept. 11. If that means I die on an airplane, fine. If that means a bomb goes off at the mall while I’m shopping for Christmas, fine. If that means I inhale anthrax opening what appears to be a normal letter, fine.

I refuse to change my normal activities. I refuse to hunker down to save my life, or the lives of my family.

Remember the Israelis who died at that night club due to a terrorist’s bomb (I think it was a car bomb)? I respect that. They were doing what they do, even though Israel is a target of constant terrorism. We can learn from the Israelis in this manner, IMO.

The way I look at it, if I do die from terrorism, I am no different than the soldier in the Middle East who dies in this war. He is fighting for my freedom. I am enjoying the freedom he is fighting for. We need to succeed at both ends of the spectrum.

I fear that America, in general, however, is overreacting, hunkering down, as a result of this wave of terrorism.

People are scared of airplane travel. People are scared of anthrax, which has killed all of four people so far. Did you know about 40,000 people die in automobile wrecks each year? That’s many more than died on Sept. 11 at the WTC. Yet, most people are unafraid to drive. Many people have no problem travelling 70-plus mph on our highways, tailgating and swerving through traffic if necessary to save a minute or two on their commutes.

If I were a postal worker in a metropolitan area, specifically Washington and New York, I’d be particularly worried about anthrax. And we need to counter this method of distributing the deadly substance to try to keep these people safe and stop this threat. And we need to beef up airport security. Etc.

But, we don’t need mass hysteria. We don’t need to fear for our lives because four people died and others hospitalized. This anthrax threat is working because it has successfully terrorized people. My coworker argued with me that she feels the media has gone too far in its constant coverage of this threat. I finally see her side. It’s not that it shouldn’t be reported. It’s that it’s getting a disproportianate amount of coverage. And some people are worried that their flu symptoms could possibly be caused by anthrax. Even if they received no suspicious packages.

It’s a tricky think finding that line between informing the public and alarming the public. So, I’m not angry with the media. I’m more angry with American people in general. We need to show the world that we’re strong-willed and willing to die by doing no more than living our lives the way we’ve always lived them.

Is that so hard?

Well, yes.

I’m glad that you’re all gung-ho to die, but I’m not. And I’m not interested in seeing my son die either, nor his mother, nor my friends.

If I feel that I can improve my chances of not dying by avoiding certain airplane flights or activities, or by being careful around my mail, or whatever, I’ll do it. Nothing like that has occurred, so like you I am living my life as normal. But I certainly do not begrudge other people their choices nor their fear, however I may disagree.

That’s just it. I don’t think there’s a strong chance of dying. But, if I do, I want to die not having feared terrorism. They win by altering our life choices, IMO. And, in the end, if they want to strike, they will, and unless authorities stop it first, there’s little you and I can do except keep our eyes open and report anything out of the ordinary.

Sorry, but I can’t equate fighting for freedom with enjoying freedom, no matter how hard I try. A soldier who risks his life on the battle field acting in our defense is a solid hero. Eating donuts at the local donut-king instead of hiding in the basement isn’t even close.

Other than that, I agree with your outlook.

:smiley:

Yes, well, maybe no different isn’t quite the right phraseology.

The point was that if I die from terrorism, I’m a casualty the same as a soldier fighting the war. I don’t, in fact, think I’m a hero, dead or alive. So, yes, your donut-king comment was a good one. Another point is that if we hunker down and refuse to consume as we would normally (donuts or otherwise :wink: ), our economy suffers.

Er…while the Israelis may well have cultivated a certain stoicism we could learn to emulate, they have certainly not reacted to the constant threat of terrorism by just “refusing to change their normal activities”. I know security procedures for El Al, the Israeli national airline, are reputed to be pretty stringent. There are also, I believe, lots of men with guns–and I don’t mean six-shooters in holsters, I mean Uzis–walking around over there, and checkpoints and roadblocks and so on (those may be more a feature of the Occupied Territories than Israel proper). I believe we have several Israeli posters and posters who have spent time in Israel, who can confirm or correct my impressions.

I’m not sure I’m really arguing with the point of the O.P. here, just noting that even as Americans resolve to “not let the terrorists win” and to live their lives as normally as possible, Americans are probably also going to have to get used to a level of public security precautions we would not have accepted a few months ago.

I agree. I wasn’t arguing that we shouldn’t beef up security. At my workplace, we have done just that. It’s important that Americans keep a watchful eye open, too. Each of us is responsible for security. And we should embrace necessary delays in the name of security.

Actually, I think America is reacting ok. It’s the damn commie-pinko media who are fanning the flames over anthrax and civilian casualties etc.

“I for one welcome our new radical Muslim overlords…”

With Bill H.'s qualification, I wholeheartedly agree with the OP.

Thank you, Kent Brockman.

I’d almost completely agree, but replace “commie-pinko media who are fanning the flames over anthrax and civilian casualties” with “crazed rednecks who think we should just nuke Afghanistan and damn anyone who says we shouldn’t do that” instead.