Are the stories from the Daily Mail incorrect?
And xenophobic Muslims use pressure cookers to make bombs. There are many ways to terrorize the public. I don’t know of anyone who champions the monster who made bombs and shot up a theater. The monster was mentally ill and should have been hospitalized, or at least medicated. Most of society hates these monsters, while some feel pity for them.
Muslims, on the other hand, need to be more public in their condemnation of the xenophobic Muslims who are constantly calling for the murder of everyone who are not like them.
My dictionary is right where I left it. Thanks for asking. 
Xenophobic Muslims have been repeatedly calling for the death of Christians, Muslims, Jews, atheists, Europeans, Americans, and anyone else who doesn’t believe as they do. That “IS” supporting evidence. So it is rational to be worried about terrorism, regardless of the terrorist’s religion, race, skin color, and mental stability.
No they are not, The Daily Mail leans a little to the right which is enough for the Left to attack on site no matter what the article has to say.
Generally. It’s the tabloid of record for bored UK housewives. Like the National Enquirer with facts occasionally thrown in. Or maybe the New York Post. Or is it the Daily News? One of those.
Rather than a ad hominem attack, perhaps you could dispute the actual figures shown in that cite by one of your own?
Bored U.K housewife’s is rather a sexist comment and very derogatory towards woman. This is a typical left wing comment, they will protest against the right whatever the subject. I was protesting with a right wing group about the lack of police investigation into the sexual abuse of underage girls, unbelievably the left protested against us when told what the protest was about the reply was, you are the right and we will protest against you all the time what ever your protest. Since then the police are investigating thousands of complaints about the sexual abuse of underage girls backed up by proven court cases. I think that it is a case of attack the author rather than debate the subject
If you’re referring to the prison cite, the implication is that these are terrorists or something. But in fact, most of these “Muslims” are actually just prison converts, as the Mail itself reports.
Where it’s wrong is in focusing on the disproportionate presence of minorities in UK jails as being an Islamic issue, when it applies to all ethnicities in the UK:
"21,937 prisoners, was from a minority ethnic group. This compares to around one in 10 of the general population.
Out of the British national prison population, 10% are black and 6% are Asian. For black Britons this is significantly higher than the 2.8% of the general population they represent.
Overall black prisoners account for the largest number of minority ethnic prisoners (49%).
At the end of June 2014, 28% of minority ethnic prisoners were foreign nationals.
According to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, there is now greater disproportionality in the number of black people in prisons in the UK than in the United States."
This is particularly evident in prisons serving London. Where the Mail fucks up is in confusing cause and effect. Funnily enough if you put more blacks and asians in jail, you will find significantly higher proportions of muslims. You then get the feedback loop which even the Mail acknowledges where people can then get protection by aligning themselves with Islam.
For historical record -
(Underline added)
No, I do not agree with the OP. I believe the well was poisoned when he stated, “It is clear that most of the respondents implicitly understood this to be foreign terrorism, since the principal solutions they supported were changes to immigration visas and bombing. It is wildly irrational to actively worry that you or your family will be a victim of terrorism.”
People are concerned about terrorism, both foreign and domestic. It happens. Therefore, it’s not “wildly irrational” to worry about yourself or your family. And I don’t see where “foreign” terrorism was implicitly understood.
If you’re worried about your family being probed by aliens, don’t go camping with mouth-breathing rednecks.
Speaking from personal experience, are ya? TTIUWP
Aliens are scared of hippies. Hang a crystal in front of your tent, no worries.
Your contributions to these discussions have large negative value.
You can’t snark your way out of a global Islamist insurgency, sadly. Sarcasm doesn’t seem to stop bullets or bombs or the executioner’s blade.
Why don’t you try directing your brilliance towards mocking Prophet Mohammed and the widespread fetishistic obsession over his degenerate behavior, for a bit? You know, for diversity. Do it publicly and you can share the load now bore by a very few brave souls like the Charlie Hebdo artists. Well, the ones are still alive, anyway.
No? Oh, I know, you are faaar to tolerant to do anything like that. Cowardice has nothing at all to do with the narrow mindedness of your contributions, of course.
“…,But I was struck nearly speechless by this complimentary thunderbolt! Never had I heard a compliment so well phrased, nor so richly deserved…”
- Mark Twain