Been on that wonderful stretch between Seattle and Chicago more than a time or two, but I’ll admit it’s been awhile.
Unless you’re getting on at the origin of the route, or it’s a frequently used commuter route, you may as well forget about being ‘on time’. But then, that’s part of the charm of taking Amtrak: the slower pace. The most ‘off time’ I’ve had to deal with was about an hour. (Tracks were slick going over the Rockys, so we had to go slower.)
The food is actualy very good, even more so if you compare it to what the airlines try to give you. Just be warned it can be a bit on the expensive side, and portions tend to be small. Bring a picnic lunch if it’s a long trip, or you’re a heavy eater.
Seats are generously sized: the cars I’ve been in are in the two seats - aisle - two seats layout, with a nice wide isle that’s more than big enough for a wheelchair to be in and still have room for people to get by. Plenty of room for your legs to stretch out, and you don’t have to worry about the person in front of you reclining their seat into your soup!
I’m not sure how much room they’ve got now days for carry-ons: when I traveled the general attitude was: “As long as you’re reasonable about it, we will be also. If the train fills up and space is being a problem, we may have you put larger items into the luggage car.”
Overall, it’s well worth it, espically if you’re going to a smaller town that’s close to one of their stops. A heck of a lot cheaper than flying, and possibly even faster under some circumstances.
Too bad they’re kinda stuck in a catch-22: more routes would mean more convient times, flexibility (get off for a few hours at an interesting looking city, then hop back on again later), and more riders, but they won’t be able to justify (read: get the money to do so) unless they increase ridership to begin with.
<< This space intentionally left blank. >>