It amazes me that people publish their work apparently without reading it; today I came across:
Bod?
There must be more out there; post them here.
It amazes you that amateurs publish their work without reading it?
Well how about hugely professional world-renowned corporations. For instance the BBC. Their news website regularly has glaring spelling errors or gramatical mistakes.
Sorry I have no examples to link to at this exact moment in time.
From the Distributed Proofreaders site for Project Gutenberg comes this gem: Directives de Formatage en Française.
Oh the irony!
whel whadaya know! some light browsing at the BBC news website and I found one already…
[
](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3090918.stm)
‘mew’?
That isn’t a typo. Some governments are offering support to develop programs for Pokemon. Some of the more forward thinking governments are supporting the development of mew-two programs.
Microsoft, meanwhile, is developing Team Rocket programs.
Yay, a Pokémon reference! I think I instantly like you.
On topic, it’s not a website, but our local newspaper constantly has horrible errors, sometimes in headlines. I read a whole article the other day where every time it was supposed to say “supposed”, it said “suppose”. For example, “He is suppose to be arriving on Tuesday.” It was gross, and it was in there at least three times.
I should work there, I can spell. 
Can’t type though. A pity.