Would a memo between Cheney and Wolfowitz detailing the plans be sufficient? What sort of “evidence” do you think might be available if the perpetrators were placed within the evidence gathering chain?
No. Pointing out how there is no evidence and that the suggested ideas strain credulity is not by any means ‘arguing from incredulity’. Please learn.
And, even if the least hare-brained doubters were way off base with their accusations in this instance, there is nothing wrong with placing organisations and individuals who wield great power under a miscroscope, and shining spotlights in their darkest corners.
Probably not for most truther scenarios, including yours.
You do realize that you cannot hide the fact that a building had demolitions used in its destruction, yes?
You would also need a large number of evidence gatherers in on the plot. Once again the number of folks involved is expanding.
There is no “evidence” to prove God conclusively doesn’t exist. It doesn’t make the claims that a god does exist any less fantastical to those with rational minds.
You’re not a Truther-you just want the answers to some questions that bug you, right? How many questions would that be, approximately?
5?
10?
20?
500?
When the answers are given to you, do you accept them, or do you ask the same damn questions the next time the topic comes up?
Are you exposing a conspiracy or just trying to get a few witchhunts in?
Not relevant. We are talking about a physical object that some claim was destroyed, not a metaphysical claim outside of the realm of engineering & science.
Witness accounts of miles and miles of det cord attached to drilled holes full of explosives weeks before 9/11 will suffice. The amount of explosives it would have taken would have been impossible to hide. Not mention the number of workers in and out of the place running said wire, drilling said holes, cutting supports, and planting explosives.
Show me a few dozen who can corroborate that story and you might have something.
I’ve yet to be shown any itinerary of the Ground Zero clean-up that specifically details the attempts to search for any explosive-related devices. Were firefighters given little diagrams of what they were looking for amongst the tons of rubble? Go on, just bring forth one investigator of the impact zones who was ordered specifically to look for such things.
Yes, I’d think so.
Lots of it, I would think. A demolition of the World Trade Center would involve hundreds of people, if not thousands, and would leave behind a lot of hpysical evidence. Someone would be willing to squeal somewhere.
But that’s not my problem. It’s the problem of someone wanting to prove the towers were brought down by some means other than the airplane strikes. If you want to convince any thinking person of an alternative theory, you have to provide some evidence.
And you know this, how? Because you’ve read or heard it somewhere? Are you aware of every advance that has been made in the capacities of military explosives?
In that case you will never be satisfied then, because I doubt very much that memos are taken when those types of people get together.
The signs of demolition charges are easy to find, an amateur could spot them with 5 seconds training. Given NIST’s post site inspection at Fresh Kills and the fact much of the clean up crew had worked on demolition sites before (they were the cleanup crew for a major demolition company) you complaint falls flat.
For your coverup to succeed, you sinister agents would need to watch every crewman working on every piece of steel recovered and then nab the pieces (which are heavy I-beams) before the crewmen noticed the details of demolition.
Seems a tad farfetched to me.
You asked. But there’s lots of other evidence that could be produced. Do you have any?
I know because I have been on demolition sites.
You are grasping at straws.
If you haven’t even supposed where they might have been, how do you know where you are meant to be looking?
State of the art demolitions technology as of 2000.
CDI had Aman’s drilling subcontractor drill 5,905 holes for CDI’s explosive placements in the tension and compression rings, roof ribs, columns and support structure under the Kingdome. During loading operations, CDI laid 21.6 miles of detonating cord and placed more than 4,700 lb. of explosives in critical locations to control the fall of the structure and reduce vibration. The explosives detonation sequence utilized over 900 delays both to control the fall of the structure, mitigate air overpressure and to enhance fragmentation of resultant debris.
Please don’t bother mentioning nanothermite. Please?
Who are you talking to?
Anyone claiming the clear-up crew were looking specifically for signs of sabotage beyond the damage caused by the planes.