And Tango Makes Three- are critics wrong that real subtext is promoting gay adoption?

[astro]

I was looking at a news item about how controversial this book was, and decided to pop it up on Amazon and read the reviews and see what the fuss was about.

The reviews were overwhelmingly positive and full of glowing descriptions of this “true” story how it promoted tolerance etc. for kids. In reading the negative reviews most were predictably about the gay slant, and the fact that it was “not Christian”, one focused (grumpily) on the fact that the story as represented was a biologically inaccurate, anthropomorphized “lie” that the penguins were “gay” & “in love”, and another negative review said the books agenda was subversive in that -

"I purchased this book, read it once, and promptly returned it. The book has one purpose - to advocate homosexual adoption. If as a parent, this is a message you want to express to your child, by all means buy the book. The message is not subtle; it is direct and is the only theme of the book. As a parent I feel that 6 years old is not an appropriate age to address the topic of same sex marriage and homosexual couple adoption.

I simply felt there was no value or purpose to the book other than the social message. If you’re not purchasing the book solely for this message - skip the book. I did."

In reading the review it struck me as intolerant, but was it wrong re the main sub-text theme being the OKness and normality of homosexual adoption?