Whoa…
I don’t even know what we’re talking about here…
Anyways, [insert pit-related expletive here].
Justhink is worse than SeaHawk because of one thing and only one thing: Justhink doesn’t know HOW TO SHUT UP. Those run-on sentences wouldmake Faulkner himself blush.
My head.
My poor, poor head.
Justhink is worse than SeaHawk because of one thing and only one thing: Justhink doesn’t know HOW TO SHUT UP. Those run-on sentences wouldmake Faulkner himself blush.
My head.
My poor, poor head.
Yeah but at least he doesn’t doublepost ::d&r::
I think belladonna has described him accurately. If you ask him to clarify, he will. But, he then adds in something else that needs clarification. You worry that it’s either just the way he writes or whether he’s thinking on the edge of a precipice.
Forgive me for returning to one of my own bugbears, but isn’t Justthink’s premise the common premise of a lot of other illogical (or, it would seem, logical to an absurd degree approaching anti-logic) whackos?
Don’t Holocaust denialists basically say that since they can’t personally verify historical accounts with their own eyes, they can reject the historical consensus out of hand?
Isn’t Justthink simply offering a parallel rationalization for anarcy?
I thought he was arguing that because the system is subject to corruption, (ie, it’s not “perfect”) that it is thus invalid and he can do whatever he damn well pleases.
Of course, that’s not too different from what you said, lissener.
Libertarian said of Justhink:
Now, there’s an endorsement for you!!
Yeah! What kind of screwy name is that, anyway?
Is it true that Hitler had plenty of meat, but only one potato?
His posts are like a terrible automobile accident. I want to turn away but I’m mesmerized by the horror of it all.