This is one of those things that I wrestle with from time to time, but with the advent of the movie, all of the questions come pouring back in. You see I think I have a pretty good sense of humor. Most of the basic funny things that everyone else thinks is funny, I also think is funny. I also tend to see the humor in many things that is lost on the general populace. Intellectual humor, I somtimes think… though maybe I’m just kidding myself.
But with Andy, things have always been different for me. Sure I thought he had an occasional funny moment, but all around me people were calling him a comic genius. I kept thinking that I just wasn’t getting it, but more and more I came to believe it was a case of the “emperor’s new clothes”. When I think of comic geniuses, I think of Johnathan Winters, Lucille Ball, Charlie Chaplin, Gene Wilder, Steve Martin, Jerry Sienfeld, Lenny Bruce, Joseph Heller, Douglas Adams, etc…
I know that Andy is sometimes characterized as a performance artist and that a cheap laugh was not always what he was striving for. His proponents say that all he wanted was a reaction… I guess this is where I never got it, because my reaction was usually something on the order of curious indifference.
As far as I’m concerned, the funniest thing about Andy Kaufman was that everyone else thought he was funny when I didn’t… Hey, mamybe that was the effect he was after, but I suspect that this is giving him too much credit.
Any Andy Kaufman fans out there that care to try and change my mind? I’m really trying to be open minded about it, because I admit that maybe I really just don’t get it…