Are you talking about the photos of children in cages that actually occured under Obama:
? Where is air pollution increasing? He is doing great on foreign policy. If he is insulting anyone, it is the globalists. How has he complimented our enemies? What secret did he give the Russians? What are his lies? As far as I know, he never said “Nazis are good people”: cite please. He thinks people are motivated to say lies against someone else so prosecutors won’t throw the book at them for stuff they may never have done.
The cite actually showed that Obama had mostly kids that traveled alone and those cages were a very temporary thing. Trump actually separated families as a policy and those cages are used more by Trump and for longer periods of time.
Currently, Trump is defying court orders and continues to try and use loopholes to avoid complying with court orders regarding reuniting families of their incarceration.
Trump’s plan is coming and the picture is not pretty:
The relaxation of pollution rules (By Trump) already in place does not lead one to assume that the situation is improving.
Hah hah ha… [wipes tear]
No.
As I pointed in the other thread, global gangsters do love how they are stealing money from the people of the world and that guys like Trump want to get an America where they will also be safe to play their games.
BTW thanks to testimony obtained by Bob Woodward Trump apologized for that by claiming that he “denounced the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups.” only to say later that that apology/denounce was the “the biggest f***ing mistake I’ve made”. Yeah, why look weak by apologizing and denouncing bad people?
That is why they got recordings of Trump and their henchmen. It is not only their word.
The anonymous subject of this thread, presumably appointed by Trump, doesn’t seem sanguine about Trump’s “things.” Is he misinformed? A saboteur from the Deep State who snuck past the vetting?
Tillerson, McMaster and Kelly, all appointed by Trump, don’t seem entirely confident about Trump’s genius. Does your vantage give you a better-informed impression of Trump than Kelly et al have? Were these quotes just invented by the Fake News media?
I know people smarter than me have already made these connections, but I find it interesting that parts of the Woodward book get released, Trump says it’s pure fiction. (GOP senators take it as true that Trump called Sessions “retarded.”) Then the opinion piece comes out and the WH says not that the things said are fiction, but that the person who wrote it should resign and that they are treasonous. Which seems an admission that they exist and are telling the truth about their actions.
I recognize that Trump has never let consistency get in the way of a good pout, but when Woodward’s book comes out, will they attempt to pivot back to “it’s all made up”?
There is a lot to address here, much of it unfortunately embeded in quotes which are omitted in a reply copy. Trump’s border detention policy is similar ti past administrations. If a wall is built, this will all be moot. And the catch and release when children are present actually endangers children, who otherwise wouldn’t be taken on the dangerous crossing.
It looks like Trump will succeed in denuclearizng North Korea, so criticizing the typical cordial compliments between meeting world leaders is absurd.
This quote from your article shows you are twisting Trump’s words. It is absurd to call him a neo-Nazi supporter:
'I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. I’ve condemned many different groups. But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me,” he said.
“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” Trump said. “The press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”
“You also had some very fine people on both sides,” he said.
And, finally, it sounds like Trump tried to help Russia stop terrorists.
Nope, that is moot once one considers that most undocumented become that by overstaying their visas. The wall in reality will underfund other more effective methods to controll immigration.
No evidence of this.
Sorry, but I already replied ahead of time to your claim of twisting his words, as he was reported to say, those statements you posted where part “of his worst mistake” ever. Meaning that what you quoted was indeed absurd, but an absurd apology/clarification from Trump.
This, like your previous silly Gish Gallop of a post, is not to point, the point was to show the evidence that indeed Trump did leak secrets. You were just ignorant of it, like with a lot of other things.
Now, I don’t know if Trump was enough of a moron to think Mexico would pay for the wall, or if he was such a liar to say they would when he knew they wouldn’t, and assume that his idiotic supporters would believe him.
As for the neo-Nazis, anyone happily marching with Nazis and KKKers is scum in my eyes. Trump only condemned them under duress, and you saw how he regretted doing so. Ditto for not condemning his KKK supporters. You know Trump gets the white supremacist vote, and depends on the racist vote.
No, Trump realized all recent presidents were puppets of the globalist elite. He ran as a republican, to fit into the false dichotomy of Republican vs democrat, which has really been a uniparty offering no real choice for a long time. His opponents have nothing to offer of substance, and so try to paint Trump and his supporters a racist, sexist, or whatever. Someone here tried to caricature the recent anti-globalist movement as antisemetic, linking it to a book from the early 1900s,which is bogus. Again, because the only play in their playbook is to demonize their opponents with false claims of bigotry.
If you don’t think that Trump bragging about grabbing women isn’t sexist, if you don’t think Trump insulting women he doesn’t like as ugly isn’t sexist, I don’t know what to say.
Actually I do, I can’t say it here.
I never said that Trump was anti-semitic, at least not more than the base level that people who grew up when he did have. But he certainly accepts support from people who are actively anti-semitic. And he retweets racist tweets. Look it up. It is time for you to fact the pile of shit who you support head on.
I used to be a conservative, and worked on the 1968 campaign. George Wallace who was running under his own stripes back then said “there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats.” This was Humphrey and Nixon. If you are an extremist, no you don’t see the nuances of position. And if you are as ignorant as Trump, you also don’t see the differences.
Here’s one example - do you think Trump has the slightest idea of what it would take to bring manufacturing back, and the impact on employment and cost?
Care to elaborate on this? What the fuck does this mean, exactly? And how doesn’t it apply to Trump, who colluded with a foreign power to get dirt on his political adversaries?
I’m reminded of how Steve Bannon tried desperately to explain how Trump, DeVos, and Mnuchin weren’t “elites”, despite the fact that they’re all billionaires. It’s nonsense - DeVos in particular comes from family money and has produced nothing of value in her life - but for some reason, you can fool countless people into thinking that an executive branch that literally has a 5 billion dollar net worth increase over Obama is somehow less elite. These are buzzwords that mean nothing.
Or maybe I’m wrong. Please, by all means, tell me - what the fuck does this mean?
:rolleyes:
Are we just going through every cliche’d pro-Trump argument here?
We are? We are. Okay. Jesus, dude, if the only criticism of Trump you’ve heard is “he’s a bigot”, you are not paying attention. At all.
I’m guessing his / her motivation is more emotional than rational, more reactionary than strategic. Maybe they reached the tipping point. Fatigue and disgust won the day and they sat down and wrote the piece. Maybe they had written and deleted it numerous times before but this time they went thru with it. Maybe the McCain funeral gave them the sense that this piece would mark the final push toward critical mass. I’m betting the writer is now in a more relaxed state of mind knowing their days in the WH are numbered.
I just got the weird felling that this is going to end like in some Agatha Christie crime novels, that in this case ***many writers ***are more relaxed.