We’re talking about GQ here. Presumably what’s of interest is the information, so if the original thread didn’t answer it there shouldn’t be a problem asking it again.
You think so wouldn’t you, unfortunately conversations don’t work like that.
It’s not really a natural conversation, though, since there may be hours or days between replies. And if people aren’t interested enough in the question to open a new thread, they can’t have been all that interested in the issue. (I do find that even when I reopen a closed thread on request, people turn out not to have been that interested in the subject after all and it soon falls off the first page.)
I assume there isn’t a per-member control that disables starting new threads. I notice in the little box in the lower LHS it tells me that I may post new threads, which implies that there are circumstances when I may not. If usable that control would seem a natural mechanism to address this problem.
Like many others, I didn’t notice who had started the thread.
Obviously, that box is not available if you are not logged in. It would also not be available if you were suspended or banned.
I believe that it is possible to put people on sabbatical so they can read the board but can’t post, but the procedure is more complicated than would be warranted for a short term problem.
At any rate, my strategy seems to have worked, since Steven Estes posted only a single thread today. (He still hasn’t replied to my PMs, however.)
Now I’m working on getting him to post in the right forum.![]()
Can’t you take away someone’s ability to post new threads? Or is that only in a newer version/some add on you guys are loathe to mess with?
I just commented on that in my second sentence above.
FYI, I have now reopened all the closed threads.