The Nutshell: I’m looking for a really solid laptop. I figure (perhaps wrongly?) that the “solidness” and reliability is a function of how well-engineered the thing is.
The Background: I’m in law school, and my fellow law-school dopers will confirm that these days, you pretty much need a laptop. My current model might as well be sewn to me. I cannot think of a time that I have been more than 50 feet from it in the last four months.
It’s a cheap-o flimsy Gateway. The reason it’s a cheap-o flimsy Gateway is because it was supposed to be my “backup computer” that I used only for taking notes in class. So I bought the cheapest computer I could find. (It was $375, plus a $50 memory upgrade I installed myself.) However, very early in the semester, my “main” computer died. So my crappy backup computer has been my main computer. This makes me very nervous. The computer has to survive a lot of nasty shocks and jolts. It gets tossed in my bag and hauled around every day. I take notes on it for 8-10 hours a day, and then bring it home and goof off on it in the evenings. I can say without exaggeration that this computer is in use at least ten hours a day. Maybe four-a-day on weekends.
My school requires a windows laptop for exams. (Actually, there’s an option to hand-write them, but the only people who do this are the ones who can write 60wpm legibly. Not I.) I’m thinking of saving this Gateway exclusively for exams and getting a more serious computer for day-to day use. I want something that’ll survive two-and-a-half more years of very heavy abuse.
The Question: Is there a manufacturer or line of products with an excellent track record on failure rates? My number one requirement in a laptop is ability to take abuse without crapping out on me. Number two is a non-astronomical price tag. I know these things are somewhat mutually exclusive, but hopefully that can be mitigated by some of the things I don’t need:
-I’m not a gamer. I don’t need a high-resolution screen or a powerful graphics card.
-I’m not a media junkie. I don’t have a music or movie collection. A 10gb harddrive would be more than enough. (And it looks like it’s even hard to find a new machine with that little storage…)
I’ve been told that all the PC manufacturers nowadays are using basically the same components, and the only real difference is packaging. That is, if you bust open an IBM and a Dell, you’ll find the same Toshiba motherboard in each, the same Medion RAM, the same Unisys power supply, etc.. So the individual parts of each laptop are going to have the same reliability factor. It’s just a matter of how the computer manufacturer puts the components together. Is this true? Is there, IYHO, really no difference between any of the PC manufacturers? Is a Compaq as good as an HP as good as an IBM as good as a Gateway, etc.?
I’ve also been thinking about getting a mac. Everyone who has one sings their praises, but it’s hard to cut through the fanboy cult and get a straight answer: are they, IYHO, really more solidly built than PCs in general? I’ve looked at macs online, and the upcharge for maxing out the memory is ludicrous. Can I buy it seperately and install it myself to save $400, or is it like the iPod battery where they don’t let you change it yourself? (Note - I’m not asking whether macs are subjectively better than PCs. That’s a different thread. I’m just asking what’s the most solidly built laptop.)
I’ve seen military-grade laptops. The kind that are bullet-proof and will survive a nuclear holocaust. But those are pretty expensive. I’m looking to stay under $1200, and those bad boys seem to start in the $3k+ range. Plus, they’re built like cinderblocks, so they weigh as much as cinderblocks. Anyone used one of those?