Not necessarily. He still might have been tased, or worse.
This does not follow. You are wrong, as you are about nearly everything here. You are incapable of viewing police actions in an objective manner.
Watch the video. The passenger and the woman can obviously see the breaching tool. The woman shrieks viscerally and complains that they’re going to mess up her car. The man’s response is less coherent but noticeable.
“I want to talk to your manager!” is an appropriate response if you ordered a Big Mac with no pickles and they gave you pickles. Not if a policeman is asking you to step out of the car.
Yes. That’s why I asked if you jerk off to this stuff. You haven’t said no. You may recall that my initial question was “Did they ask nicely.”
That’s not asking nicely. Particularly since they had already pointed guns at these people.
Every word of this is a lie. He was not disorderly. He was sitting in his car talking to the officers. He was not incoherent. I understood every word he said. Are you dumb, or are you being disingenuous?
He says several times that he’s not the operator of the vehicle. (I know you don’t get big word. It means driver.) The word you quoted him saying is “operating.”
Correct. And since you didn’t deny it, I’m treating it as confirmation. I’m not judging or anything; everybody has turnons. I’m just saying that now that I know you masturbate to this stuff, it does explain a lot.
I’m not the one who cries brutality at every instance of a white police officer using force against a black person.
That’s still not a “clear indication”, and at that point, I doubt anything they could have done would have prevented the cops from using force.
You are not capable of determining what is appropriate with regards to the police. You’re always wrong about this.
No. You cum.
Neither am I, but you’re the one who never cries brutality. Your point of view (in addition to extreme cowardice and abrogation of basic moral duty) seems to be “if the cops do it, it’s legal”.
The call to 911 was not to protest the seatbelt violation. It was about fear – that turned out to be well-founded – that the cops would turn violent.
It would be nice to live in a country where an innocent Black man had nothing to fear from a White policeman. There is plenty of recent evidence that that country is not the U.S.A.
At the risk of [del]Godwinizing[/del] Cheneyizing the thread: The argument that the cops should damage a car and tase an innocent man to avoid wasting minutes of their precious time is the same argument as the 2003 reason for invading Iraq: “Good idea? Dunno, but our boys are getting bored in the desert, not even allowed to fraternize with Saudi girls.”
They could have gotten out of the car.
In your opinion.
I seriously doubt that would have prevented force from being used.
And everyone else’s, here, apparently.
Isn’t there a board rule against accusing members of being sexually turned on by whatever they’re advocating for?
His and pretty much everyone’s not seated inside the Reichstag.
ETA: ninja’d.
So, for the $10,000, then; why did the cops Tase the man?
And that country is this one. If the man in question had been obeying the law he would have had nothing to fear.
Because they thought they could get away with it, perhaps. I can’t think of a legitimate reason to tase someone sitting in his car, with no weapon, and with no one in any danger.
Your point of view (in addition to extreme cowardice and abrogation of basic moral duty) seems to be “if the cops do it, it’s legal”.
[/QUOTE]
I guess you didn’t read the thread about the Charleston incident, or about the police rapes, then.
Only if the accuser is proven wrong.
But you understand that sort of assumption of guilt until proven innocent, right?
If there is no immediate danger, there is ZERO reason why officers should do anything other than wait for the non-violent, traffic-infracting citizen to comply. Any police force that believes otherwise is not one I want ‘protecting’ the citizens of my town.
Considering the multiple examples of black men obeying the law and still being mistreated by cops that have been presented, like the guy who was shot after obeying the order to present ID, this is a blatant lie.
Sorry, I’m afraid that’s not the correct answer, we’ve got some lovely parting gifts for you.
They Tased him because he refused to leave the vehicle of his own volition. Had he stepped out of the car as instructed, they would have had no cause to use force to remove him from the car.