While it’s an attractive idea, it’ll only work if the money the Reader gets out of it is clearly worth whatever trouble they ahve to go to.
I’ve got a feeling that, as a businees, they sort of look at the Straight Dope as a collective, and judge it’s profitability altogether.
I can’t say if Cecil’s column sells newspapers, but the online version probably doesn’t net much revenue. Almost all the ads on the Straight Dope Front Page seem to be for the Reader itself. As well, we’ve been told that the reason new Straight Dope book collections have become less frequent is because they don’t want to print another one until they finally sell out of the latest one.
Now, the books have a prospective market of, well, anyone who goes to bookstores, I guess. But almost noone is in the market to buy this CD except members of the board. So at best there are 40,000 potential customers. Most of whom won’t buy the CD, I expect. Considering they can’t sell the books, and that that market for the CD is small, would the Reader go for it? Would it be profitable? I think they see the Straight Dope merchnadising as a bit of a hassle.
Still, I’d be excited to have one. And if the boards ever go down, I would definitely buy one,even if it was a little pricy.
[sub]Shh!, Stu. Don’t say that so loud. They’ll get ideas…[/sub]
One thing. dantheman said:
I thought that it takes more hamster exertion to find the old ones. I’m sure I’ve seen the staff recommend that, if we must search, to limit our searches to as short a time window as possible, instead of searching ‘Since the Beginning’, as a habit. The search feature was adjusted a while ago to allow more short periods to serch in, too, and I thought this was to help people search in just the last few months instead of having to use the longer periods, thus saving the hamsters some exercise.
Am I wrong?