Another victory for free speech

Yes, the professor shouldn’t have ruined the student’s sidewalk chalk drawings.

Still, what he did was ruin the student’s sidewalk chalk drawings. That’s kind of being a real dick, you know? Ruining a child’s chalk drawings? What kind of an asshole does that?

On the other hand, imagine some leftist students making chalk drawings, and some conservative guy ruined their chalk drawings. And the students cried and cried over it, and tried to get the conservative guy punished for ruining some chalk drawings. Crying over ruined sidewalk chalk drawings seems to me to be the quintessence of fragile snowflake syndrome, you know? I thought conservatives like to pretend they are a bit tougher than that, but I guess not.

I didn’t see anyone crying.

Is it your contention that the medium (in this case chalk) somehow diminishes the 1st amendment right of the students here? Because it sure seems like you are (emphasis added). Had it been “a drawing” devoid of political content, you might be right. But it wasn’t, and so you aren’t.

Sheesh, Lemur. You’re better than that!

All of this, basically.

It’s entirely reasonable to query whether the student genuinely had permission for something explicitly against the written rules (which they may have received or not). And regardless of whether the chalk drawings were permitted or not, the professor remains a massive dickhead for what he did and the way he did it.

Back in my day [cough wheez] we called them YAFfers.
The Young Americans for Freedom membership was nationalists and Moral Majority types (the seeds of the Tea Party, I guess) who were policing universities to call attention to professors whose lectures they deemed ‘too sympathetic to Left-Wing interests’ or ‘heretical to Christian Truth’ or similar accusations. This was during the height of the Reagan administrations Contract with God or whatever they called it.

I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if the YAFfers are still around or have resurfaced with the latest Right-Wing rise in power.

–G!

They quite frequently seem to come from Fox news, the New York tabloid (Post? Daily? :smack: I just saw the publications and differences delineated in another thread and can’t remember them now. ), or the UK Daily Mail.

I did immediately wonder if Fox would have bothered to run the story if the professor had been disciplined for interfering with chalk art promoting something like Gun Control or LGBT Rights rather than a Right-Wing plank. Perhaps they would have run the story criticizing the artists – or would it have been “no outrage to find here!” ?

–G!