Try to keep up. I asked why I should be a feminist, you asked me to define feminism “in two sentences or less”. An absurd restriction, that put me in mind of those “in five words or less” consumer competitions that brands sometimes run.
Your post is very poor, not least because it attacks me and not what I say. Poor form, even for a bear.
Well if you won’t read my posts, in which I’ve explained my position and my experience and understanding of feminism, why should I write anything for you (even if you do ‘allow’ me more than two sentences… :rolleyes:) Again, I’ve asked why I should be a feminist. Your response was, apparantly, “cagey” - you asked me to define feminism. By the by, if you define a duck as an equine quadruped, it’s still going to quack and lay eggs.
I have.
I fail to see the bearing of one on the other. Should you not be trying to convince everyone to be a feminist?
No, I want you to engage with me on the basis of what I’ve already written, rather than start all over again just for you. If you can’t or won’t do that, don’t worry, I will neither point nor laugh. But I doubt I’ll respond in any other way either.
Feminism is an equine quadruped. It quacks and lays eggs.
Now I’ve played your game, on my terms. Are you going to convince me to be a feminist?