I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but I keep forgetting. The latest thread on guns, the fearmonger one, reminded me.
According to the ACLU website, the Supreme Court made up its mind in 1939 (US vs Miller) regarding their interpretation of the Second Amendment. These are the final two paragraphs of the brief found here:
"The 1939 case U.S. v. Miller is the only modern case in which the Supreme Court has addressed this issue. A unanimous Court ruled that the Second Amendment must be interpreted as intending to guarantee the states’ rights to maintain and train a militia. “In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a shotgun having a barrel of less than 18 inches in length at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument,” the Court said.
In subsequent years, the Court has refused to address the issue. It routinely denies cert. to almost all Second Amendment cases. In 1983, for example, it let stand a 7th Circuit decision upholding an ordinance in Morton Grove, Illinois, which banned possession of handguns within its borders. The case, Quilici v. Morton Grove 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied 464 U.S. 863 (1983), is considered by many to be the most important modern gun control case." (bolding mine)
This, to my mind, make it obvious that regulation and control of Americans’ use and ownership of guns is allowable, reasonable and legal. Those that would stand behind another interpretation of the Second Amendment are wrong, according to the Supreme Court.
What do you gun guys and gals think about this? Again, it seems cut and dried to me. I’d love to hear what anyone, gun or anti-gun, has to say about this info.
For the record, my position on gun control is that handguns should be banned, period. Automatic and semi-automatic weapons as well. Good ol’ rifles and shotguns are fine, as I believe that hunting is a good thing, and frankly is the only personal use of guns that makes any sense to me. But thems who like to shoot and have contests and such could still do it.
I’m starting this thread at an inconvenient time, I know. But if I wait I’ll forget again. I put this in the Pit because I never go to GD, plus I imagine the fur could start to fly. Thanks for reading.