It’s kind of like producing a parody of The 1/2 Hour News Hour (Fox News’ short-lived attempt at a conservative-tilting The Daily Show). You can mock how inept and unfunny it is, but you’ve nowhere else to go - there isn’t enough depth to it to mine for insights.
I get a chuckle out of “Kelly’s” work, but it’s a superficial take on a superficial thought process, so I don’t look for profundity.
I agree with Kelly politically but I see his style as a parody of the political cartoon genre. The Manichean thinking, the vast oversimplification, and the overly busy drawings are great satire of just about every political cartoonist.
In your defense, they aren’t funny, but rather purposely unfunny (IMO), and the only real clue that they’re satire is that they appear in the Onion rather than, say, the Washington Times.
Yeah, I understand that some do get it and don’t like it. I personally think that its humor lies in being so heavy-handed and so simplistic in its satirical representation. I can see though how it may not appeal to some who are well aware of the joke but don’t think much of it or how it represents the outlook of others.
No…didn’t work. I watched a couple minutes, and found myself absolutely uninterested. The guy’s narration is just a mirror of his cartooning style: he’s pretending to be a total moron and jerk, and… Meh. Boring.
(What can I say? I don’t like Beavis and Butt-Head either…)
I can completely understand why people don’t consider Kelly funny at all. I agree with the reasons they list. But he still makes me laugh, or at least chuckle, with every cartoon.