I was prompted to post this by the Atlantic magazine’s [url=https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2019/11/introducing-new-look-atlantic/601762/] recent redesign.
The Atlantic is the only print mag we subscribe to that I read it cover-to-cover. I guess they say the new look makes appearance more consistent across all platforms, but to someone who appreciates print newspapers, magazines, and books, having the print version resemble reading it on a phone is not exactly an improvement. I try not to reflexively give in to my Luddite tendencies, tho, and welcome others’ views.
They make a big deal about changing their logo to just a capital “A”. Well, I guess that makes sense for apps, but to me, it doesn’t matter at all. Big deal.
My biggest complaint is the new font. It is a custom “condensed” font, which they claim allows more type per page. But they seem to combine that with increased white space - which REDUCES the type per page! No longer possessing young eyes, I’d prefer a larger type…
The short articles up front are now in 4 columns per page. To my eye, that approximates the sense of scrolling on a phone, which I’ve never thought a desirable way to read long material. Moreover, the added columns increase the negative space, defeating the purported reason for the condensed font.
Most confusing to me are the increased use of pull-quotes. What purpose do they serve in a magazine like the Atlantic? Each article has a headline, and generally an enlarged first paragraph. How many readers are going to start/continue an article because of a pull quote on the 3d or 4th page? To me, it is a distracting waste of space.
(As long as I’m being critical, the Jan/Feb issue had an article with a subhead “W’s and L’s” - for Wins and Losses. Is THAT acceptable punctuation now?)
Years back, we discontinued a Discover subscription after a redesign made it less readable to our eyes. Wondering if the Atlantic will have similarly redesigned its way out of our home.