anyone know the straight dope on theresa neumann?

hello all,

i’m a long time SD reader, and i’ve visited this board on several occasions as well. i have a question regarding a famous stigmatic named theresa neumann, but i decided to post it here first before consulting the master.

anywa, i came across a thread at my message board yesterday that got me feeling extremely skeptical. the thread was about theresa neumann, a stigmatic who lived in the first half of the 1900’s. after an exhausting 5 to 10 minute web search, all i could find were christian websites that backed up this information. i was wondering if any of you knew any differently, as some of this information seems like it couldn’t possibly be true. this is the information posted about her:

so, any of you dopers know the straight dope on theresa neumann? any information would be appreciated. i’d hate to let all my friends just go ahead and believe in something that’s obviously fictional. thanks in advance…

Cecil’s take on stigmatics in general.

Something about Therese Neumann here.

Also, this from the Skeptical Inquirer:

My vote: not a miracle.

hmmm… it wasn’t exactly the stigmatic aspects of the story that i was concerned with. i’ve read cecil’s column on it already, and even if i hadn’t, i still would never believe that stigmata was the result of divine intervention…

what i was wondering about was the “didn’t eat or drink ANYTHING for over 36 years” comment… i can’t see how this would be possible. others i have consulted inform me that this was actually relatively common in bavaria, common enough to even have a word of their language devoted to it… to which i said “huh?”

thanks for the help, though…

If you don’t eat or drink for more than 36 hours you begin to run into problems related to dehydration. If you go more than a few weeks without water, you are courting death. 36 years is simply impossible.

•often spoke fluent Latin, Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic, though not even haven been instructed in anything. native german speaker. studied by linguists, who were outskilled by her ability.

Well, I can’t give a factual answer for this particular case, but here is the method (the modern term is spin):

Person says, “Omnium orbis gafoozalum est”.

Latin linguist says, “Some of those words are Latin, but I do not recognize gafoozalum, I have never heard or read it in all my studies”.

Advocates of person say, “See? She outskilled him in Latin!”