This is something I do appreciate. We have contestants who have built their own practice courses, and then let others train on them. We have competitors coaching others on how to do the course, running against them. Even the rivalries are very friendly - a shared conquest to be the best. That is refreshing.
The Japanese version often has this, I haven’t seen it in the US version. There is one guy who runs in a mask. He’s a parkour guy and wears the mask as a concentration aid kinda thing. There was one guy dressed in body paint - I noticed the next contestant had a smear on his shirt. The US version doesn’t appear to have any of the joke contestants, unless they run those on G4.
It is surprisingly affective. Taller guys or guys with great rebound can take them one foot to a pylon, but in the damp weather the condensation has tripped up a few folks. Even if you’ve practiced it, the unexpected slipperyness can foil the best.
Are women running on the same course? The only indications I’ve seen is they mentioned one guy’s wife was taken out the previous day, and they show in some of the practice footage a woman doing balance beam tricks in her kitchen in high heels. If so, no woman has made it through day one to make the prelim trials.
That’s a little unfair. No woman made it to the day 2 for any region. Typically there is a “Women of Ninja Warrior” show that is for female competitors. The challenges there tend to be less upper-body strength centric and focus more on balance and coordination.
That’s not to say the women competing aren’t excellent athletes, but they do run a separate course just for women.
That is true. Being a Parkour enthusiast seems the most appropriate background - Parkour is about adapting to whatever landscape and challenges you find. But a good parkour practicer is going to be part gymnast, part rock-climber, and part acrobat.
Which shows you how tough this course is. People who specialize in random assortments of physical feats of strength, agility, and endurance who practice regularly and pull off amazing feats of daring-do still have difficulty succeeding.
Yes, there is extensive editing to streamline the show. I have noted how they cut out the clock on the cargo climb, show some crowd shots, and then the guy is magically at the top of the climb, the clock jumped 2 minutes forward. No break in the dialogue to suggest they aren’t giving the play by play real time.
I understand there’s a need to edit from hundreds down to the 30 for day one, but the day 2 show (that runs on NBC) doesn’t make sense to me. How do they pick which ones to show? Why do we get to see 5 minutes of profile on Jack Stupid, who then trips on the bungee ladder, then they edit out three people who complete the course? Doesn’t make sense to me. How is this stuff decided?
Welcome to America. (Seriously, I hope they don’t award if no one completes the whole course.)
The obstacles seem to come in types or classes. They trade out obstacles within one class or type, but each course has the same number of obstacles and the same variation of types. So in that sense, they are fairly even.
Part of the course is to create obstacles and try them out and see how effective they are, to incorporate into later versions of the challenge. So it makes sense to try out variations in different prelim rounds to see what is most challenging, and then develop an ultimate version for the Finals in, say, stage 3. The course evolves, the challenges evolve. Too many people can do the monkey bars? Spread them further apart. Too many people can do the log grasper? Make it a sliding target they have to grab on the move. Etc.
You see, this is my prior comment. One region has 8 people who didn’t complete the course, whereas this region eliminates several people who did complete the course. Seems a bit unfair. But they compete by region, and that kind of policy allows for variances in difficulty between the different region tests. So what if the Texas regional had two easier obstacles than the California one for a slightly less challenging course overall? California still gets the same number of seeds to the Finals.
From what we’ve seen, the Salmon Ladder is one of the hardest from pure originality. It takes a blend of strength, timing, and balance. There’s no standard way to practice, no existing Salmon Ladder courses or equipment. You have to make your own if you want to practice, and practice is a great advantage. But from pure endurance, the Lamp Grasper and the sliding rings are probably harder.
Compare different versions, where the Salmon Ladder has gone up for 10 or 12 steps. That is going to get exhausting. Then doing a big jump at the top. Vs hanging by only your hand grip, no way to even brace your feet or get leverage.
The Ultimate Cliffhanger currently is the obstacle to beat, because it involves a lengthy climb using only your finger strength to support your body, and then includes height transitions with gaps. The 4 ft gap with 3 ft height drop is the doozy. But folks have been practicing this, so we will see how it goes this year.