Now that was funny 
That is a good point. However if doesn’t practice what he preaches what does that say about what he preaches?
Tell you what The Tao’s Revenge. If you make a prima facie case that I am being hypocritical, then I’ll respond to it. Before that, you aren’t worth the time. A prima facie case should include at least a definition of the term “hypocritical,” a description of the relevant facts, and an analysis of how the facts meet the definition.
Note, I’ll only respond if The Tao’s Revenge does this, nobody else (unless I change my mind).
It may feel fresh, but it still smells like three day old flounder.
Pussy.
*hyp⋅o⋅crite
/ˈhɪpəkrɪt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [hip-uh-krit] Show IPA
Use hypocritical in a Sentence
–noun
- a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
- a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.*
Example: building your education, and by extension, career using government programs. Then complaining that they’re wrong.
Dude, you just copied and pasted a definition and then laid out the facts. You missed the part where you relate the facts to the definition, ie, the actual meat of the argument where you show your reasoning. You just put a definition on top of an assertion, which does not add up to an argument.
No vote until October. Obama and his band of liberal douches lose this round in their ongoing effort to douchify the country.
Not sure if this is douchetastic or douchetacular. Certainly not doucheriffic.
I should hope so. The idea of sanitary napkin sandwiches is really just too horrible to contemplate. :eek:
Does this mean that it’s too late to take you up on your offer? 'Cos I could use a new set of tires on my Windstar.
ewwwwwwww
(no barfing emoticon??)
Ketchup, anyone?
For liberal douches, it’s a complete douchetastrophe.
'Kay. Thanks for reminding me. I mostly read the op-ed pages, so I sometimes forget about the rest of the newspaper. 
Not sure I like “douchetastrophe,” but it is better than “douchesaster.”
I wouldn’t even say it’s much of a bad thing at all. There’s no good reason to rush a program like this, and we could’ve wound up with something worse than no program at all. I’m biased though being one of the unwashed masses with a fake job and no health insurance, unless eating apples counts. Then I’m good.
They have PMs for this, moron.
Guests can send PMs?
I thought I’d let everyone benefit from seeing TTR’s inability to construct an argument.
Be more effective if you offered some sort of contrast. Rush Limbaugh calling Mike Moore “fatso” misses the mark.
I’m not nitpicking. You’re the one who dismissed a perfectly good response by claiming that it didn’t apply to “real jobs.” Don’t make statements if you’re not prepared to support them.
“Napkin sandwiches?” Clearly, no one has ever had it worse than you.
Please support this. On what basis do you assert that most people who put themselves through school do so “at the expense of others?”
Thirty-five grand annually isn’t exactly big money, and certainly not what I’d expect from someone who worked at the same place for 35 years. It sounds more like you advanced through a series of pay grades and modest promotions. Hard work - yes. But nothing you’ve said about your work suggests that you had any kind of plans for advancement.