Apocalypse Now--"new" observations

The scene didn’t work for me. It still seems pretty plausible based on the reality of what happened during the war. The Michelin Rubber Plantation, the largest in Vietnam, continued to operate throughout the war. It was a staging area for North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces. A number of battles were fought over the area with the US paying for damage to rubber trees. The Viet Cong basically let the plantation operate as it did while the French were still in charge. The assumption was that they were being paid off by Michelin. It takes money to run an insurgency.

I’ve also seen mentions of rubber plantations in memoirs that IIRC weren’t Michelin. ISTR they were smaller and also untouched by the VC. Again the assumption of being paid off to ignore the plantation is a part of the story.

That sense of implausibility is part of the reality of the Vietnam War. Sometimes life is so strange it doesn’t work well in fiction.

[RIGHT][/RIGHT]

Yes! You are a better reviewer than Ebert, or Siskel, (and many critics of the time); one of them gave the film a negative review becuase, summary, we have this long journey up the river and when we get to Kurtz he is this man in the shadows and we can’t see him and nothing is explained.
Brando showed up overweight and he didn’t know his lines. There are many outtakes of him improvising, and Coppola writing, and rewriting, he didn’t know exactly what he wanted to say, this is about Heart of Darkness transported to Vietnam. Not easy

But Kurtz in the shadows, and then his face appearing out of the darkness, one of the great scenes in movie history.