Welcome to the SDMB!
Regards,
Shodan
You don’t really come here for the hunting, do you?
Subtle. I like it.
So we’re done talking about “police reports.” Good.
Again, this is not true. None of the documents involved specify that it is anyone’s home address. However, if it were, it would show that (1) Mr. Hirsi owned or leased the property; (2) the congresswoman moved there after divorcing Mr. Hirsi; and (3) Mr. Hirsi decided he would rather live and open a second business there (you didn’t miss the fact that his other business was only a couple blocks away, did you?) and ceded what had been his and the congresswoman’s home back to the congresswoman so she could move in with her new husband. Besides, Mr. Hirsi and the congresswoman had two young children: it would have been awkward, but hardly shocking, if the five of them did share an address for a time, and it certainly doesn’t support any of the accusations you’re parroting.
Oh, shame on you, Rat. You promised you understood about making assumptions based on the address on a driver’s license. But where do you pull this crap from? Mr. Elmi’s traffic ticket.But again, you studied just hard enough to get it backwards.
Suppose you, a recently divorced Muslim woman, want to get married again, and it suits your custom or desire or convenience to hold the wedding at home. But it’d be kind of rude, wouldn’t it, to have the ceremony at either of your ex-husbands properties (nod if you understand).
So maybe at the home of a friend or relative or someone hospitable that your husband is staying with until your marriage, or one of their friends and neighbors. Where was the ceremony held? Oh look, Eden Prairie. Congratulations, Rat: further proof (that noone needed) that people are slow to change their addresses at the DMV. At this point I’d say you were arguing in bad faith if…it were necessary.
You got that right. Shall I point out how right?
Thanks for the wall of gibberish. Let’s chat about this.
First up, because I suspect you’ll come back to this, a presence on social media does not give your wife anything useful to a process server, and neither does designing a website from abroad. Second, because why let people get away with this kind of sloppiness, a printed name doesn’t confer identity. I have an unusual name, and I’ve met two other people who have it. Or, as another example, how about the congresswoman’s sister? There are at least three prominent Sarah Noors in the U.S. alone, and who knows how many others. In addition to the founder of Grit Partners, there is an actress, and a doctor at Sloan-Kettering. Wow, I keep running into the most admirable people on one side of this story. But on the other, it just keeps getting stupider.
The source here is the Daily Caller, which, as noted above, not reliable and with a history of lying and misleading about Democrats in particular (that’s from the source you used to praise the Washington Examiner by the way). But that’s not the worst, most obvious proof of bad faith on the whole right-wing side of this.
And here it is. you are repeating the accusation that the congresswoman lied, for reasons nobody can articulate, in a May 2017 divorce complaint by saying she couldn’t have her husband served (again, thus making it harder for her to obtain the divorce), and the proof is that someone with two of her husband’s names designed a website, from abroad, TWO YEARS LATER AND A YEAR AFTER THE DIVORCE WAS FINAL. You sap: shrivel up and go away.
And, as if anyone were still reading, this is how the smear machine works: right-wing bigots with no reputation to lose make up a story, right-wing bigots with a reputation to lose carefully print stories that are factual but journalistically pointless except to mention those elements that do not prove, but exist in, the original lie, and right-wing bigots who are stupid or acting in bad faith or both, conflate the two and repeat it over and over and over. The point is not to make sense, it’s just to repeat the slander.
Alpha News says Santa Claus. Daily Caller picks it up. Post-Dispatch and Washington Examiner print stories saying chimneys exist and some people eat cookies. Internet trolls say See!!! And don’t stop.
What I want to know is when Ilhan Omar became “beloved by the board,” and why I wasn’t notified.
(Is there already such a thing as a “sweetening the well” fallacy, or did our devotee of Shodan invent it?)
You mean other than the text, “Home Address”? :dubious:
I’m willing to go through a prosecution/defendant process on the evidence, but not if you’re unwilling to be honest. Do I need to screenshot the documents and circle in red the words “home address”?
Grumble Ignore that last (sorry, I just woke up). Yes it does not literally say “home address” but…I mean come on. Deciding that a couple of college students would put down some arbitrary non-home address smacks pretty strongly of denialism. And we’re still not even to the point where we’re talking about setting up photo shoots and using photoshop to set up hospital scenes and create counterfeit hospital wrist bands. If you’re already going to be getting into denialist territory at this point, this isn’t a worthwhile discussion.
If you don’t mind, can you give me the elevator pitch for this… scandal… or whatever it is? I’m a bit behind the curve on this whole thing, because there’s a lot of “she married her brother” and “she lied about something or other” and “here’s a photo with a hospital bracelet!” I’m not even sure what I’m supposed to be denying ever happened, or what I’m supposed to be outraged about from a politician I never heard of before a month ago.
I’m mostly, and only mildly, curious why Putin would choose a non-candidate to send his Web trolls after, unless it’s just for training on a small board.
Putin has used his trolls to promote anti-vaxxer nonsense. The idea is to enrage and divide people as much as possible, not just to attack candidates.
Belated honesty when caught out earns no points.
Pleading for the benefit of the doubt. Remember what I told you about obvious bad faith? That’s why you don’t get it. If you did, it wouldn’t matter because, again, you just don’t read, or pretend not to.
(bolding added this time).
I haven’t denied the existence of any of these documents-just noted that you’re claiming they prove something they don’t, and hoping no one checks. There’s that bad faith again. Anyway, now onto the garbage no reputable outlet will touch.
It’s only because this is all you have left, and I like to be neat, that I bother with this sewage. Link to these photographs and wristbands, source them, tell me how they mean anybody did anything even mildly naughty, and I’ll dispose of them then.
Debunking incoherent bigoted lies is always worthwhile. Don’t be too hard on yourself: if you didn’t supply the lies, I couldn’t supply the debunking.
Oh sure - now with the slut shaming.
Help, help! I’m being oppressed!
Did you see that? Did you see him oppressing me?
Regards,
Shodan
I cant go into the process as I was exposed as a Russian troll in another thread and am now moving to Vladivostok- being moved, actually. My handlers are very disappointed after years of training I was only able to make around 300 posts before being outed- a dubious record of sorts, I am told. As punishment, I will spend the next two years in a windowless shed manning the mommy blogs and Ugly Betty fanfiction sites, with only a thin borscht and gallons of cologne for sustinance.
I risk the gulag for even returning for this post, but did want to know, so I can avoid that error in the future, if someone could let me know what the ‘tell’ was that outed me? I mean, surely it would not be possible to post almost 300 times in a second language, (one where I have never had a conversation with a native speaker), and fool all the bright people here even for a minute- I must have accidentally slipped in a nyet somewhere, or perhaps referred to the USSR as CCCP? I mean Im not dumb, I know the basics- theyre posted on all the bare walls of my sector- don’t post too often in threads about beets, don’t list Yakov Smirnoff as one the ten best stand-ups, don’t start threads about which after shave tastes the best, those things- but surely there was something I missed?
The others warned me, don’t post on the SMDB, they are too smart there, you will be outed and will compromise the entire mission for gods sake, go to the Akron Beacon Journal like you were told- but I got cocky I guess.
глупый тролль
Just pointing out, in case you are genuinely confused about this: an incestuous marriage by definition is one “contracted between persons related to a prohibited degree”. A marriage between such close relatives is called incestuous whether or not the contracting parties actually have a sexual relationship.
So yes, Shodan’s thread highlighting rumors that Omar married her brother was deliberately bringing up the allegation that Omar had made an incestuous marriage. AFAICT, Shodan did not allege that Omar had a sexual relationship with her brother, nor did BigT claim that he did. Shodan “claimed the incest argument” in the sense that he encouraged the (so far completely unsupported) rumor of Omar’s incestuous marriage. (And of course, the main propaganda reason for starting rumors about incestuous marriages is to horrify and repel the many people who naturally jump to the conclusion that such marriages involve incestuous sex.)
in·cest
[ˈinˌsest]
NOUN
sexual relations between people classed as being too closely related to marry each other.
the crime of having sexual intercourse with a parent, child, sibling, or grandchild.
Incestuous marriage
In other words, two closely related people who marry are participants in an incestuous marriage whether or not they are committing incest per se, i.e., engaged in incestuous sexual activity.
Huh. I guess you really were confused about that.
Pretty sure they meant Omar Little.
Well, as long as you’re here, I hope you’ll clear up all these rumours about you marrying your brother.
Cite that the newspaper is liberal?