I didn’t say you needed to cite anything. I said you didn’t support your argument. The only point you elaborated on at any particular length is that everyone who says waterboarding is torture is being led by their emotions and can’t form a coherent argument.
You failed at the second while succeeding at the first - to the point that we’re having this conversation now.
Here’s how you actually expressed that opinion in the thread:
Your post in this thread is somewhat nuanced; this is just obnoxious. I don’t think you could have expected a reasonable discussion to result from this kind of post. It’s confrontational and rude, and so was much of the rest of what you said in your other posts.